Redfern et al vs Transamerica Moving, Inc. et el

Filing 70

ORDER APPROVING 65 parties' Stipulation for an extension for plaintiffs to file their opposition to 59 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Transamerica Moving, Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, Motion To Strike. ( Plaintiffs' Response due by 1/6/2010.) Defendant's reply shall be filed in accordance with LR 7-2. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/15/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
485 W. FIFTH STREET, RENO, NV 89503

Laurence P. Digesti (SBN 88) Matthew P. Digesti (SBN 9793) THE DIGESTI LAW FIRM LLP 485 W. Fifth Street Reno, NV 89503 [e-mail] Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 775.323.5944 Attorneys for Defendant Transamerica Moving, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ***** JONATHAN REDFERN and MARGARET REDFERN, individually and As husband and wife, and as next friend Of their minor children; Plaintiffs, vs. TRANSAMERICA MOVING, INC., a California corporation; ALEXANDER PLOTKIN, ALLA ZHUK, TONY PLUMMER, FRANCISCO (last name Unknown), and JOY (last name unknown), All individually and doing business as TRANSAMERICA MOVING, INC.; BLACK and white CORPORAITONS; ABLE and BAKER COMPANIES; RED And GREEN PARTNERSHIPS; and JOHN DOES I through X, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DIGESTI LAW FIRM LLP

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Case No. 3:09-cv-317-LRH-VPC STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE FILING DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNTIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION ; ORDER

THE

On November 16, 2009, a hearing was held before the Honorable Magistrate Cooke on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Motion for Service by Publication. During the hearing, Magistrate Cooke and the parties agreed upon a briefing schedule for Defendant's

­1­

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
485 W. FIFTH STREET, RENO, NV 89503

Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike. Defendant filed the Motion on December 3, 2009. Plaintiffs' Opposition is due on December 20, 2009. During the FRCP 26(f) conference held on December 9, 2009, the parties agreed to stipulate to a mutually convenient extension of Plaintiffs' Opposition to January 6, 2010 and Defendant's Reply to the Opposition in accordance with Local Rule 7-2. The parties hereby respectfully request that the Court extend the filing deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike, to January 6, 2010 and Defendant's Reply to the Opposition in accordance with Local Rule 7-2.

DATED: December 10, 2009

THE DIGESTI LAW FIRM LLP

DIGESTI LAW FIRM LLP

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2009. _______ day of _______________2009 By: /s/ Mark E. MacDonald, Esq. (SBN 1275830) 9938 Ontario Dallas, TX 75220 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jonathan Redfern, Margaret Redfern, individually and as husband and wife, and as next friend of their minor children. DATED: December 10, 2009 MacDonald + MacDonald, P.C. By: /s/ Matthew P. Digesti, Esq. (SBN 9793) 485 W. Fifth Street Reno, NV 89503 Attorneys for the Defendant Transamerica Moving, Inc.

THE

_________________________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ­2­