Blake v. Baker et al
Filing
87
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
13
14
15
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
3:09-cv-00327-RCJ-WGC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On January 6, 2012, this court issued an order for petitioner Blake to show cause why this
16
case should not be dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted pursuant to Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S.
17
509, 522 (1982). Docket #85. On January 13, 2012, Blake filed a response indicating that he
18
chooses to not abandon his unexhausted claims. Docket #86.
19
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for
20
failure to exhaust state remedies pursuant to the total exhaustion rule of Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509,
21
522 (1982). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
22
DATED: This 18th day of January, 2012.
23
24
25
26
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
