Murillo et al v. Oakley, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER APPROVING 4 plaintiffs and defendant Alar Staffing's Stipulation for Defendant Alar to file an answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs' complaint. (Response due by 8/21/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/7/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 950 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP Jeffrey D. Winchester, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10279 Christ ina M. Mallatt, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9112 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 950 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 252-3131 Facsimile: (702) 252-7411 Attorneys for Defendant ALAR STAFFING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARTHA MURILLO & EMMA MONTES, Plaintiffs, vs. OAKLEY, INC., ALAR STAFFING and DOES I-X, Defendant(s) Plaint iffs Martha Murillo and Emma Montes and Defendant Alar Staffing ("Alar"), by and through their counsel o f record, hereby respectfully submit this Stipulation, Request and Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint (the Stipulation"). This Stipulation is made in accordance with LR 6-1, LR 6-2, and LR 7-1 of the Local Rules of this Court. This is the second request for an extension of time to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Co mplaint. Alar was served with a copy of the Summons and Complaint in this matter on July 18, 2009. Fisher & Phillips, LLP was retained to represent Alar in this matter during the week of July 27, 2009. Additionally, lead counsel for Alar is out of the State from August 3-5, 2009, at a client conference where he is presenting. This request for - 1LasVegas 80961.1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 3:09-cv-00353-LRH-VPC STIPULATION, REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (First Request) FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 950 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 an extensio n of t ime is made to allow Alar's newly retained counsel sufficient time to do the required research and preparation to properly respond on its client's behalf. Upon agreement of Plaintiffs and Alar Staffing, it is respectfully requested that this Court grant an extensio n of t ime, up to and including August 21, 2009, for Alar to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Co mplaint. By entering into this Stipulation, Alar does not waive any rights it has under statute, law, or rule to challenge or oppose Plaintiffs' Co mplaint. DATED this 3rd day of August , 2009 LAW OFFICE OF MARK MAUSERT DATED this 6th day of August , 2009 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP /s/ Mark L. Mausert Mark L. Mausert, Esq. 930 Evans Avenue Reno , NV 89512 Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Jeffrey D. Winchester Jeffrey D. Winchester, Esq. Christ ina M. Mallatt, Esq. 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 950 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant MONTANA INVESTMENTS, INC. DATED this 5th day of August , 2009 /s/ Mauricio Hernandez Mauricio Hernandez, Esq. P.O. Box 7347 Goodyear, AZ 85338 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: IT IS ORDERED that Alar Staffing's request for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Co mplaint is granted and said answer or response is due on or before August 21, 2009. August 6, 2009. DATED:________________ ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE __________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE - 2- LasVegas 80961.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?