Mellema v. Poehlman et al

Filing 4

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the District Court enter an Order dismissing this action with prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with LSR 2-2. Objections to R&R due by 10/22/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 10/6/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// MICHELLE MELLEMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL POEHLMAN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________) 3:09-CV-0362-RCJ (RAM) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

This Report and Recommendation is made to the Honorable Robert C. Jones, United States District Judge. The action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the Local Rules of Practice, LR IB 1-4. BACKGROUND On July 8, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. #1). On September 16, 2009, the court sent Plaintiff its Order (Doc. #2) which was returned, with the notation "RTS-Closed" (Doc. #3). LSR 2-2 provides that "The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice." Without such notification the court can process this case and it becomes unmanageable.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Because of this circumstance and the Plaintiff's failure to comply with LSR 2-2, it is recommended that the District Court enter an order dismissing this action with prejudice. RECOMMENDATION IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the District Court enter an Order dismissing this action with prejudice. The parties should be aware of the following: 1. That they may file, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule IB 3-2 of the

Local Rules of Practice, specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation within ten (10) days of receipt. These objections should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" and should be accompanied by points and authorities for consideration by the District Court. 2. That this Report and Recommendation is not an appealable order and that any

notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgment. DATED: October 6, 2009.

____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2