Phillips v. Palmer et al

Filing 42

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's 38 Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to do one of the following: (1) inform this court in a sworn de claration that he wishes to dismiss ground 4 of this 9 petition, and proceed only on the remaining ground for relief; (2) inform this court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to dismiss his 9 petition to return to state court to exhaust his st ate remedies with respect to the claims set out in ground 4 of this petition; or (3) move to stay this action while he returns to state court to exhaust his state remedies with respect to the claims set out in ground 4 of his petition. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
o !% h --- ----- Ft. tï -o E IR O NEE cts o: -' - S f II(K - jy . ) EJ E ii E ' R OR C F VT F f ; . F C I' E EC . ZD - 2ES 2 8 21 CC 1 2 CL(KSII lCfNE? ïi EISCS F FC ..)î tI .î B% - pllRl CD R1 2U x v 3 4 5 ! q if ) tl E' a 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTR IC T CO U R T DISTR IC T O F NEV A D A I 9 D A V I BALDU S PH I LP S, D L 1 0 11 vs. Peiine, tto r Ca eNo.3:9- V-037 - C.( PC) s 0 C 0 7R ! V O RDER 12 JACK PA LM ER ,etal, . 13 1 4 Res ondent . p s 1 5 The c ur de e m i e t at ttone di note ha s hi sat - o r r m e i s f r o t t r n d h pe ii r d x u t s t ec u te de o 1 gr u d4ofttpeiin(/)a dtcc ur die tdpeiine t de iewha t dowihta 6 on h tto /9 , n h o t rce tto ro cd to t ht 1 une ha se grund.Ore (/7) Peiin rha sbmitdaRul 6 1 )moin( 38)whihte 7 x u td o d r /3 . tto e s u te e0 to # , c h 1 c urco sresa amoto t rc nsde iseale ore ( 3 )b c us tec u th sn te trda 8 o t n tu s in o e o i r t rir d r # 7 e a e h o r a o n eé 1 tn lud mc t Repond nsh vesbmitda opposton( 39 .Thec urtn stat 9 i a j g n . s e t a u te n ii # ) o ti d h 2 r c nsde a i n i not ra td, nd t ec ur de ist emo i n( 38 . 0 e o i r to s wa r n e a h o t n e h to # ) Doc. 42 Phillips v. Palmer et al 21 Th c ur i notpe s a e by p ttone ' a gu e tt a t e c ur s oul c nsde e o ts ru d d e ii r s r m n h t h o t h d o i r 22 g ou d 4 e h use be a s he c t d f de a - o r opi i n i hi s a e c ur b i f . Ast e c ur rn x a td c u e ie e r lc u t n o s n s t t - o t r e s hot 23 e plie i isorer(/ 7 , ndasrs o de t agu i terop oston(/9)ciainofafdeal x an d n t d /3 ) a ep n ns r e n h i p ii /3 , tto e r24 courtopi i n doesnotneces arl pr s ntan i s e off der lconsiutonal1 w t t e st t cours. no s iy e e su ea tt i a o h ae t 25 Gr u d 4 i a c ai t a t e s a e c u t e e y f rde rva i n ofa d r c a pe l r i i g die t on s l m h t h t t - o r r m d o p i to ïe t p a - a s n r c 26 a pe li s e i a sa e p s - o vi ton ha e sc r uspe ii n, ih t e rghtt a poi t d p a s u s n t t o tc n c i b a op tto w t h i o p n e 27 c uns l i ac ns iuto aly i a e u t s bs iut f ra dic t ppe l Se Loz da v.St t ,871 o e - s o tt i n l n d q a e u tt e o rc a a. e a ae 28 P.d944( e .1 9 ) Astec ur notd,h opiinsta peiine ctdi saec ur i s ppor 2 N v 9 4 , h o t e te no h t tto r ie n tt o tn u t Dockets.Justia.com E i o u E . r p . i ! 1 ofhi c ai di notde i e i s e ofc n tt to all w . Th s opi i ns i t r r t d t e Fe e a !lm d c d s u s o s iu i n a o e n o n e p ee h d r l 2 RulsofCrm i alPr ce ur ,whi hdo n ta pl t sae c ur c i i a pr c e igs a d t e e in ode c o p y o t t- o t rm n l o e d n , n h y 3 deennie ta termed frade lve diec a pe l st va aea dr-ntrtej dgme tof t n d h th e y o pi d r t p a wa o c t n ee e h u n I : 4 cniidehslwnaiuiapaprcedne'thcertiosedwerornoapavil ovtnt aoi det e.noefoupipdlt cusfpesos co,u l g r p lln rotsonn ih ct s u l o c ei hd 5 ta tef rl onsiuinrq rdti o u ,he o sofa p a ea t ga s pe s r b t h e a c ttto e e hs r 6 overf der lcrm i alcas s. e a in e 7 The courti alo notper uaded by t eopi i nst atpettonercied i hi st t - ourt ss s h no h ii t n s ae c 1 ' 8 ope i g bre t a di m e ton c ns iutona I w . Pe ii n rc t d D oua a v. lf r i ,37 U . . n n i f h t d n i o tt i l a tto e ie l s Ca io n a 2 S 9 353( 9 3) f rt epr p stont att eSi t Amen m e trgh t c uns le tndst adiec a pea 1 6 o h o o ii h h x h d n i t o o e xe o r t p l 1 fo aj dgme tofco viton.Peiin rcie Andesv. lfr i, 6U. . 8(967)f rte 0 rm u n n ci tto e td r Caio na 38 S 73 1 ,o b 11 pr posii n t att e Si t Am endm entr quies counselt f l t e appealand t i entf pos i l o to h h x h er o ie h o d iy sb e 1 i s e e e t ough c uns ld e notbe i ve t a t os is esha e ar a ona l pr ba iiy of 2 su s v n h o e os le h t h c s u v e s b e o b lt ' 1 s c e s SeeEx. p .1 - 1(/4) Neihe o te ehv SuprmeCour opiin h l ta te 3 u cs. 234, p 0 1 /3 . t r f h s o e t no s od h th 1 f de al ons iuto r quie a pa tc l rp oc dur wht c uns l prve adef nda to a die t 4 e r c tt i n e r s ri u a r e e n o e de i s e n f rc 15 appcal . 16 Fi aly,t e cour i notper uaded by Pettoner' ar um e tt atbe cied Roe v. nlh ts s ii sg nb t 1 Flrsore a 5 8U.. (000,i hi saec ur rpl bre.Se Ex.2 7,p. (/4) Tote 7 o e - tc , 2 S 470 2 ) n s tt-o t e y if e 3 3 /2 . h 18 ext ntt atpettonerwastyi g t r ie a f der lcons i tonali s e,N evada does notalow t e ch ii l n o as e a tm i su lh 1 9 20 21 22 2 3 riigo ne is e i rpl b if.Tho a v. ae 1 8P.d72 ,735& n. 1( ev. 6)(iig asn f w su s n c y res m s Stt, 4 3 7 2 N 200 ctn Ne . Ap . 28()'Br wniav.Stt,91P.d39 5 ( e . )(a tl Le nadv. ae, v R. p P. c) o n , ae 3 , 4 N v 2004 sm ; o r Stt 95 P.d I 20,1 37( e .1 98 (a e) A pr ce u al i c n-c mehodofr iig a is e 8 2 2 2 N v 9 ) sm . o d r l n o e t t y asn n s u beoeasaec ul d e n te ha s tatis e Se Catlev.Pe nls 48 U.. 3 1(989 . fr tt o - o s o x u t h su . e sil t o e , 9 S 346, 5 1 ) I I THERSFORE ORDERED ta peiine ' Rul 60()moton( 38 i TS h t tto rs e b i # ) s 24 DEN I D . E 25 I I FURTHER ORDERED ta peiin rs alha etit ( 0 da sfo ted t TS h t tto e h l v hry 3 ) y rm h ae 2 ofe tyofti or e t doon ofteflo ig:( )ifr ti c ur i as onde lrto ta he 6 nr hs d r o e h o lw n 1 n om hs o tn w r caain h t 27 wihest dimisgru d4ofhi peiin(/) a dprc e onl ontermaniggo ndsfr s o s s on s tto /9 , n o e d y h e i n ru o 28 rle ()if nntj c ur i as or de lrtonta bewihe t dim ishipeiin(/)t eit 2 n o bs o tn w n caai h t s s o s s s tto /9 o ' . 2. ' d I * .. ,. F ' ' 1 r t r t st t coul t exhausthi st t r m edi sw ih r s ectt t e cl i s s touti gr und 4 ofhi e u n o ae 'o t s ae e e t ep o h am e no s 2 peiin(/) or()mov t s yti a tonwhiehertr st saec ur t e b us hi sae tto /9, 3 e o 1 hs ci l eun o tt o to x a t s tt 3 rme iswihrs e tt tecamss tou i ro nd4ofhi peiin(9) Falr t c mpl wil e de t ep c o h li e t n u s tto # . iu e o o y l 4 r s l i t e di m i s loft i acton. eutn h s sa hs i 5 Dat d:Decem ber28,2010 e ' 6 7 . . 8 p 1 0 11 U nied St t s 't i tJ dge t ae rc u . . . I 1 2 1 3 1 4 15 ' 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3- s i i ' ,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?