ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. Silver Sage Insurance Brokers et al

Filing 35

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 12/23/2010. IT IS ORDERED that P's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the following claims in the complaint: the Fourth Claim, Respondeat Superior, ag ainst Silver Sage; the Fifth Claim, Unjust Enrichment, against Silver Sage and John Stoker; the Seventh Claim, Indemnity and Contribution, against Silver Sage and John Stoker; and the Eighth Claim, Equitable Subrogation, against Silver Sage and John Stoker. Judgment may not be entered in this action until all claims as to all parties have been disposed of. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

Download PDF
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Silver Sage Insurance Brokers et al Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ) a New York corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SILVER SAGE INSURANCE BROKERS, ) LTD., a Nevada corporation, ) JOHN STOKER, individually, and ) as President of Silver Sage ) Insurance Brokers, Ltd., and ) JOAN PAGE, individually, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________) PRESENT: Deputy Clerk: EDWARD C. REED, JR. COLLEEN LARSEN Reporter: 3:09-CV-00433-ECR-RAM MINUTES OF THE COURT DATE: December 23, 2010 U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE NONE APPEARING Counsel for Plaintiff(s) Counsel for Defendant(s) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS NONE APPEARING NONE APPEARING On October 22, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (#33) against Defendants Silver Sage Insurance Brokers, Ltd. ("Silver Sage") and John Stoker, as to certain counts of the complaint. Defendants did not respond within the time required by the Rules of Court. Therefore, we entered an Order (#34), which gave the said Defendants fourteen (14) days to respond to the Motion (#33) and we warned Defendants that if they did not do so, the Motion (#33), which appears to be well taken, will be granted. Defendants have failed to comply with our Order (#34) and have not responded to the Motion for Summary Judgment (#33). IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#33) is GRANTED as to the following claims in the complaint: the Fourth Claim, Respondeat Superior, against Silver Sage; the Fifth Claim, Unjust Enrichment, against Silver Sage and John Stoker; the Seventh Claim, Indemnity Dockets.Justia.com and Contribution, against Silver Sage and John Stoker; and the Eighth Claim, Equitable Subrogation, against Silver Sage and John Stoker. Judgment may not be entered in this action until all claims as to all parties have been disposed of. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?