Aronson vs Thomas J. Matthews, et al

Filing 24

(Copy of Judgment from Base Case 3:09-cv-467-ECR-RAM): JUDGMENT: On July 2, 2010, the Court Ordered (# 81 ) that IGTs Motion to Dismiss (# 54 ) be granted and that Plaintiffs would have twenty-one (21) days with in which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Signed by Lance S. Wilson, Clerk. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BLG) (PDF/IMAGE ATTACHED).

AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
***** DISTRICT OF NEVADA

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
FRANK J. FOSBRE, JR., derivatively on behalf of INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, ) ) 3:09-CV-0467-ECR-RAM (Base Case) ) Member Cases 3:09-CV-0489, ) 3:09-CV-0536, and 3:09-CV-0542 ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS J. MATTHEWS, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) and ) ) INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,) ) Nominal Defendant ) ______________________________) JEANNE M. CALAMORE, derivatively on behalf of INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS J. MATTHEWS, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) and ) ) INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,) ) Nominal Defendant ) ______________________________) 1 3:09-CV-0489-ECR-VPC

SANJAY ISRANI, derivatively ) on behalf of ) INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY) _____ ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ROBERT A. BITTMAN, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) and ) ) INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,) ) Nominal Defendant ) ) IRINA ARONSON, derivatively ) on behalf of ) INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS J. MATTHEWS, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) and ) ) INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY,) ) Nominal Defendant ) ______________________________) X

3:09-CV-0536-ECR-RAM

3:09-CV-0542-ECR-VPC

Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

On July 2, 2010, the Court Ordered (#81) that IGT's Motion to Dismiss (#54) be granted and that Plaintiffs would have twenty-one (21) days within which to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint.

2

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs.

August 5, 2010

3