Hernandez v. MCDANIEL et al

Filing 207

ORDER that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 206 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including August 15, 2019, to file their response to Petitioner's motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 204 ). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 FERNANDO NAVARRO HERNANDEZ, 8 Petitioner, 9 Case No. 3:09-cv-00545-LRH-WGC v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 206) 10 11 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 12 13 14 In this capital habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Fernando Navarro 15 Hernandez, filed a motion for leave to amend on July 2, 2019 (ECF No. 204). 16 Respondents were due to respond to that motion by July 16, 2019. See LR 7-2(b). 17 On July 16, 2019, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 206), 18 requesting a 30-day extension of time, to August 15, 2019, to file their response to the 19 motion for leave to amend. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is 20 necessary because of his obligations in other cases. The petitioner does not oppose the 21 motion for extension of time. 22 The Court finds that Respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good 23 faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension 24 of time requested. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time 2 (ECF No. 206) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including August 15, 2019, 3 to file their response to Petitioner’s motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 204). 4 5 DATED this 18th day of July, 2019. 6 7 8 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?