Hernandez v. MCDANIEL et al

Filing 276

ORDER granting ECF No. 251 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 221 Fifth Amended Petition. Respondents' answers due 6/7/2021. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 FERNANDO NAVARRO HERNANDEZ, 8 Petitioner, 9 Case No. 3:09-cv-00545-LRH-WGC v. 10 11 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 251) WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 13 14 In this capital habeas corpus action, after a 60-day extension of time and a 45- 15 day extension of time, the Respondents were due to file an answer by April 23, 2021. 16 See Order entered September 10, 2020 (ECF No. 242) (120 days for answer); Order 17 entered January 7, 2021 (ECF No. 248) (60-day extension); Order entered March 10, 18 2021 (ECF No. 250) (45-day extension). 19 On April 14, 2021, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 20 251), requesting a further 45-day extension of time, to June 7, 2021. Respondents’ 21 counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of personal family and 22 medical matters. The Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time. 23 The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and 24 not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of 25 time requested. 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement 27 of Time (ECF No. 251) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including 28 June 7, 2021, to file their answer. 1 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further 2 proceedings set forth in the order entered February 20, 2015 (ECF No. 94) will remain 3 in effect. 4 5 DATED this 19th day of April, 2021. 6 7 8 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?