Azpilcueta v. The State of Nevada, ex. rel. Transportation Authority et al
Filing
155
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (# 122 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carson City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (# 132 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal of all claims against Defendant Marcos Brito (# 153 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 1/5/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case
r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
*****
DISTRICT OF
NEVADA
DAIANA AZPILCUETA, individually and on
behalf of CAL-NEVA TRANSPORT & TOW,
INC., a Nevada corporation,
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
V.
CASE NUMBER: 3:09-CV-00593-LRH-VPC
JERALD L. HAFEN, individually and as
Director of the Nevada Division of Public
Safety; TONY ALMAREZ, individually and as
Chief of the Nevada Highway Patrol;
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, individually
and as the Nevada Attorney General;
CHARLES TOLOTTI, in both his professional
and individual capacity; DEAN BUELL, in
both his professional and individual capacity;
JOHN MCGLAMERY, in both his
professional and individual capacity;
WILLIAM PROWSE, in both his professional
and individual capacity; CITY OF CARSON
CITY, a municipality of the State of Nevada;
KEN FURLONG, individually and as Sheriff
of Carson City; STEVEN SCHUETTE, in both
his professional and individual capacity;
STEVE ALBERTSEN, in both his
professional and individual capacity; KEVIN
MCCOY, in both his professional and
individual capacity; MARCOS BRITO, an
individual; and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50,
Defendants.
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried
and the jury has rendered its verdict.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been
tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
X
Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been
considered and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (#122) is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carson City Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#132)
is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for voluntary dismissal of all claims against
Defendant Marcos Brito (#153) is GRANTED.
January 5, 2012
LANCE S. WILSON
Clerk
/s/ D. R. Morgan
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?