Mulder v. MCDANIEL et al

Filing 193

ORDER granting ECF No. 192 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents' Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 174 ) is due January 4, 2021. Respondents' Responses to the Motions for Discovery (ECF No. 185 ) and an Ev identiary Hearing (ECF No. 187 ) are due January 4, 2021. In all other respects, the schedule set forth in the Court's Order of May 2, 2019 (ECF No. 162 ) remains in effect. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
Case 3:09-cv-00610-JAD-WGC Document 193 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Michael J. Mulder, 4 Case No.: 3:09-cv-0610-JAD-WGC Petitioner v. Order Granting Motion to Extend Time 5 William Gittere, et al., 6 Respondents [ECF No. 192] 7 Respondents move to extend time 1 to file their reply in support of their motion to 8 9 dismiss 2 and their response to petitioner’s motions for discovery 3 and an evidentiary hearing. 4 10 The court finds that respondents’ request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of 11 delay. In addition, respondents’ counsel represents to the court that opposing counsel does not 12 oppose the request. So, with good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 13 respondents’ motion to extend time to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss and to 14 file their response to petitioner’s motions for discovery and an evidentiary hearing [ECF No. 15 192] is GRANTED. The reply and responses are due January 4, 2021. In all other respects, the 16 schedule set forth in the court’s order of May 2, 2019, 5 remains in effect. 17 Dated: November 2, 2020 18 _________________________________ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey 19 20 1 ECF No. 192. 2 22 ECF No. 174. 3 ECF No. 185 23 4 ECF No. 187. 5 ECF No. 162. 21

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?