Mulder v. MCDANIEL et al

Filing 214

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents motion to extend time to file their file their answer (ECF No. 213 ) is GRANTED. The answer is due August 12, 2022. In all other respects, the schedule set forth in the courts order of May 2, 2019, (ECF No. 162 ) remains in effect. Signed by District Judge Cristina D. Silva on 6/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJD)

Download PDF
Case 3:09-cv-00610-CDS-CSD Document 214 Filed 06/14/22 Page 1 of 1 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 MICHAEL J. MULDER, Petitioner, 6 7 8 Case No. 3:09-cv-00610-CDS-CSD ORDER v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 9 10 11 12 Respondents move to extend time to file their answer to the remaining claims in 13 petitioner’s second-amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 213. The court finds 14 that respondents’ request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. So, with 15 good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion to extend time 16 to file their file their answer (ECF No. 213) is GRANTED. The answer is due August 12, 2022. 17 In all other respects, the schedule set forth in the court’s order of May 2, 2019, (ECF No. 162) 18 remains in effect. 19 DATED this 14th day of June, 2022. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?