Mulder v. MCDANIEL et al

Filing 217

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' motion to extend time to file their file their answer (ECF No. 216 ) is GRANTED. The answer is due October 11, 2022. In all other respects, the schedule set forth in the court's order of May 2, 2019, (ECF No. 162 ) remains in effect. Signed by Judge Cristina D. Silva on 8/22/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

Case 3:09-cv-00610-CDS-CSD Document 217 Filed 08/22/22 Page 1 of 1
1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5

MICHAEL J. MULDER,
Petitioner,

6
7
8
9

Case No. 3:09-cv-00610-CDS-CSD
ORDER

v.
WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.

10
11

Respondents move to extend time to file their answer to the remaining claims in

12

petitioner’s second-amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 216. The court finds

13

that respondents’ request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. The court

14

also notes, however, that the respondents have had nearly eleven months to file their answer, So,

15

this request will be granted, but any further requests will be denied unless respondents can

16

demonstrate extraordinary circumstances. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’

17

motion to extend time to file their file their answer (ECF No. 216) is GRANTED. The answer is

18

due October 11, 2022. In all other respects, the schedule set forth in the court’s order of May 2,

19

2019, (ECF No. 162) remains in effect.

20

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2022.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE