Adkins v. Skolnik, et al

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 43 Motion to Extend Time : P's Reply to 41 Response re 33 Motion to Strike due by 6/16/2011; Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) does not permit the filing of an opposition to an answer to a compliant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 5/17/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
FREDERICK W. ADKINS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MARK HERRERA,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________)

3:09-cv-0628-ECR (RAM)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
May 17, 2011

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE ROBERT A. McQUAID, JR., U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:

JENNIFER COTTER

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. #43) and Defendant has
responded to the Motion (Doc. #46). Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time
(Doc. #43) is granted in part and denied in part as follows:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. #43) is GRANTED to the extent
that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to file his Reply
to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion to Strike Order Granting Out of Time Extension.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. #43) is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s
request for an enlargement of time to file an Opposition to Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) provides for the filing of a complaint and an
answer and various other pleadings. The Rule does not permit the filing of an opposition
to an answer to a complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk