Huck et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1

2 3
4 5

6

UNI ED STATES DI T R I T C O U R T T S C

7
8

DI TRI T OF NEVADA SC

9 THORNE HUCK andYVONNE HUCK,
1 0
11 v.

3:9- V- 0643- CJ-VPC) 0C 0 R(
O RDER

Fllrtfs, 7Eili f

1 COUNTRYW I E HOM E LOANS,I C , et 2 D N,
al, .
l 3 1 4
l5

D ef ndant . e s

1 6

The Cour s ays aI pr ceedi gs i t i case f rt e f l w i g r ason. Att e end ofl s tt lo n n hs o h ol n e o h at

1 year t e Unied Stt sJudiil 7 ,h t ae ca PanelonMuliDititLiiaton,(he 1 aneI)consol at d t- src tg i t ' P ', ' ie d
1 num er uscas si whi hpl itfsal get at orgageEl c r ni Regitaton Syst m s,I c. 8 o e n c an i l h M t fe e to c sr i e n,

1 (' ERS', 9t M ' engagedi i pr perbusiesspr ctc swhenpr cessighome lans.ThePanel ) nm o n a ie o n o
2 assgned Ju geTei or i t e DititofArz na t over eet ese cases, he wi pr si e 0 i d l g n h s rc b io o sh and l ed l

21 overaIisues ( icover ,diposiie motons,setlment excep f rtil. I r Morgage ls ds y s tv i te ) t o ras n e t 22 Elctoni Regitat n Systm s ( ERS)Liiaton,MDL No.2119 ( ec.7,2009) l i er c sr i o eM ti g D . nt s
23 deci i n t cr at t i m ulidi ti tI i aton, he Panel so o e e h s t s rc i g i t t cons l at d ni e cases f om Nevada, oi e n d r

24 butnot d t ataddionaldag- l ng'cas s wi si i rf c ualisues c ul be added t t e eh t i ' ao ' e t m l a t s t h a od oh
25 I tofc nsol at d cases. i s o ie d 2 6 Fol w i g t e Panel deci i n, ER S m ov d t add num er us 'ag- l ng' es t t e lnh o ' s so M eo o ' ao ' t cas o h

27 m ul- ititI i aton, ofwhi h i t e case curen l bef r t e Cour,The Panel ant d t d s rc ig i one i t c sh r ty o e h t gr e
28 M E R S'r quest ,butonl as t t ose i di i ualcl i s t at' el t t t e f r aton and/ r e s y oh n vd am h ' a e o h o m i r o
1

l oper ton of M ER S . The Panelf rher i di at d t at; I ci i s i t ese actons t atar ai ' ' u t n c e h ' I am n h a i h e 2 unr l t d t t e f r aton and/ r oper ton of t e M E RS s s em ar separ t l and eae o h o m i o ai h yt e a ey

3 si ul neousl r m anded't t e dititcour i whi h t ey wer fr tbr ught mt a ye ' o h s rc tn c h e is o ,
4 I I htoft e Panel deci i n,M ER S and t e m any i di i ual ai tfs i t ese cases ni g h ' s so h n v d pl n i n h f

5 have fl d m ot ns wih Judge Tei or i whi h t ey di put whi h cl i s shotl be pal of i e i o t l gn b ch se c am ld ' t
6 t e m ulidi ti t I i aton and w hi h shoul be sent back t t ei orgi alI catons. Judge h t- s rc i g i t c d o h r in o i

7 Tei or wi be deci i g t i i s e once t e m ateri f l bref d .Because of he hi h vol m e lgl b l d n hs s u h t s ul i e y t g u 8 ofcases i vol ed i t ese m otons,t i be a num bero m ont s untl n v nh i iw l l f h iJudge Tei or has r l d lg b ue

9 on aIoft e isues afec ig t i c se. Accor i gl ,t e Cour her by s ay a1pr ceedi gs I hs f tn hs a dn y h t e ts Io n
1 i t i case, The Cour wi addr ss t e m o i ns i t i case i t e eventt atJudge Tei or 0 n hs ll l eh to n h s nh h lg b 1 r m ands cl i s back t t i Cour. 1e am o hs t 1 2 CONCLUSI N O

l 3

Acc r i gl ,I I ORDERED t ataIpr ceedi gs i t i case ar STAYED pendi g o dn y T S h lo n n hs e n

1 Judge Tei or ' or ert r m and bac t t i Cour. 4 l gs d o e b k o hs t

1 5
16
17

D TED: i . . d yo Api2 1 . A Ths ' e a f r,O O V. /V l

18

.

1 9
20
21 22

R e C. one UNI ED STAT *DI TRI T JUDGE T SC

23
24

25 26 27 28