Soriano vs USAA Insurance Agency, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand to State Court is GRANTED. (Clerk Notes: Certified copy of this order and of docket sheet manually served on the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, 75 Court Street, Reno, NV 89501, on 6/25/2010.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/24/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNI E D STATES DI TR I T C O U R T T S C 7 8 DI TR I T OF NEVADA SC 9 JOSE SORI NO, A ) ) 3:9- V- 0661 RCJ-M M ) 0CO -( 1 v. 0 11 1 3 Pat, lnf ii f Deen a t f d n. ) o on ns ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 USM I SURANCE AGENCY,I C. 2 N N, 1 4 15 16 1 7 k Thi i an ac i n agai s an i sur rf r deni lof a cl i . Pl i tf Jose Sorano ss to nt neo a am a n if i (' litf )sued hi isur r Def ndantUSAA Gener lndemni Co.ODef ndann,nst t ' a nir p sn e, e aI t1 y e t) i a e c ur f rbr ach o c ntac ,br ach oft e i pl d c venantof o to e fo r t e hmi o e good f ihand f i dealng, at ar i and 18 19 20 u f i cai s p acies u de Ne ad Re ied St tt s jq 6 6 . 1 ets q. Def n an n ar l m r tc n r v a vs aue 8 A3 0 e ed t r m oved t e c s t t i Cour. Pr sen l bef r t e Coul i Pl i t fs Moton t Remand e h a e o hs t e ty o e h ' s an i' t f io (#) Defnd n fed a op ost n ( 1 )an Pl it f e l d ( 1 ) Th Co l h ar or l # . e a t i n p ii # 1 d a ni r p i # 3 . e t' e d a l o f e l t ar um enton May 28,201 . The Coud now i sues t e f lowi g or er I I HEREBY g 0 s h ol n d.TS 2l 22 ORDERED t a Plitr Mo int Reman ( )i GRANTED. h t a ni s t o f o dM s 1 BACKGROUND , Pl i tf pur hased aut m obi i sur nce f rhi vehi l fom Def ndant Pli tf a n if c o ln a e os ce r e . a n if 23 24 25 26 pur has dt evehil f r$35,00.Def ndantalegest atPlitf s ent$7,00t upgr de c eh ce o 0 e l h an if p 0o a t e vehil . Pl i tf al ges hi vehi l wasst l n and des r yed.He notfed Def ndantof h c e a n if l e s ce oe to ii e IDef ndantass ds t ati was i pr pery sued as i e eht mo l : USAA I sur nce Agenc I c. na yn , , 27 :E 24 ! 1 t e al ged l ss on Januar 3,2009. Def ndanti ves i at d t e l ss and det r i ed t at hl e o y e n tg e h o emn h 2 Pl i tf had made m ir pr sent tons and c nceal d peri entf ct . Def ndantdeni d a n if se e ai o e tn as e e 3 Pl i t r cl i . a ni s a m f 4 Pl i tf sued Def ndant i st t cour f r br ach of cont act br ach oft e i pled a n if e n ae to e r ,e hmi 5 covenantofgood f ih and f i deal g ,and unf i cl i s pr c i es under Nevada Revi ed at ar i n ar am a tc s 6 Stt t s ââ 686A. 10 etseq. Pl itf asked f rdamages i exc ss of$10,00 and f r a ue 3 a n if o ne 0 o 7 punii e dam ages. O n Novem ber9, tv 2009, endantr m oved t t i C oud. Pl i tf m oved Def e o hs a n if 8 t r m and back t st t cour on Nov m ber 13, oe o ae l e 2009. 9 On Novem ber3O, 2009,Def ndantti d t getPl i tl t stpui t t cap damages at e re o an i o i ae o 1 $75, 00. Pl i tf r f sed. 0 0 a n if e u 1l I. LEGAU STANDARD I 1 2 dfatanytmebef r fnaludgmentiappear t att edititcour Ickssubect t r ' l i oe i j t s h h src ta j mate 1 j rs iton,hecaseshalber manded. 28 U. . , 1 47( ) Remov lsatt sar srcl 3 u id ci t le ' ' S C j 4 c, a t u e e tity 1 c nsr e ag is r mo a j r dit n Ri he F UpJ h Co , 39F.d 1 1 , 31 ( t Ci. 4 o tu d a n t e v lu i ci . t y . o n .1 so c 3 3 3 1 6 9h r 1 1 98 .Gau k Mi s,9 0 F.d 5 4,5 6 (t Ci.1 92 . 'F der l u idit n mu tb 5 9) , s ' l 8 2 6 6 9 h r 9 ) de a j rs ci .e o se 1 rj ct d i t er i anydoubtas t t e rghtofr movali te frtist nce.' I .( uotng 6 ee e f h e s oh i e n h is n a ' d q i ' 1 Lihar v Sanl Monia Da/y Co. 592 F.d 1062,1064 ( t Ci.979). The def ndant 7 b t, a c r , 2 9 h r1 ) e 1 al ays has t e bur en ofest blshi g t atr m ovals pr per Gause,98O F. d at566. 8w h d ain h e io. 2 19 11 ANAlYs1 1. -s 20 Dier i j rsditon r quies tatt e amounti c ntover y exc ed $75,00. 28 v st u i ci e r h h y nor s e 0 21 U. . .j 1 3 ( ) W h n a pan i h s al ge a s e ic a oun i c nto ery i hi SC 3 2a . e lit f a l d p cf m t n o rv s n s f e i 22 c m pl it hi al gaton i gi en wei ht l ac i nsorgi al br ughti s at c ur, pl i ts o an, s l i s v e g . n to in l o y n t e o ta an i 2 h sn ic n iet ifaehsd ma est a he edv r i jrs it n. er f r ,f plit f 3 a o n e t o n lt i a g o c iv ie st u idc i Th eo e ia a n i v y o f 2 brngsan ac i n i s at cour andal gesanamounti contover ygr at r han t e mi i um 4 i to n t e t i e n r s e et h nm 25 f rdieriyj rsditon,adiere def ndantmayr movet fder ic ur unlsst er i a o v st u i c i vs e e oe a o t e h es 26 l gal c rai t t at pi i tf w i not r c v r an am ount above t e m i i um f r di er iy e e t ny h a n if l l eoe h nm o v st 27 jrsditon. Bec use a plitf mayifat hi damagest achive dier iyjrs iton i u i ci a an if nl e s o e v st u idci n 28 ac i ns orgi aly br ughti f der lcour ,i a pl i tf brngs an ac i n i f der lcour and to in i o ne a tf a n if i to n e a t 2 1 aleges i good f i an amount i c ntover y gr at r t an t e mi i um f r di er i l n at h nor s ee h h nm o v st y 2 jrsditon,he c ur mayonl dimist eacinit er i a Igal tit t atte plitf u i ci t o t y s s h to f h e s e cerany h h an if 3 wilnot r coveran amount above t e mi i um f r dier iy jrsditon. Sanc ez B. l e h nm o v st u i ci h 4 Monum entlLieI s.Co. 102 F.d 398, ( t Ci.1 96) a fn , 3 402 9 h r 9 . 5 W her a pl i tf has not al ged a specii am ounti cont over y,t e def ndant e a n if l e fc n rsh e 6 cli ig r movalj rsditon bear te bur en of est bl hig a sufiint amount i am n e u i ci sh d ain s fce n 7 con r ver yby a pr ponder nceoft eevi ence.l . t404. ccaa v M assac usetsM ut al to s e a h d da , M . h t u 8 Liels.Co.33O F,Supp. 11 3,1145( . 2004) Thedef ndantc nnotr l onbar în , 2d 4 D Nev. . e a ey e 9 al gatons. He mus pr duce evi ence t suppor a su fci ntamounti contover y f r li e to d o t fi e n r so 1 dieriyj rs iton. See Sarchez,1O2 F.d at405.Mccaa,33O F.Supp.2d at11 6.A 0 v st u id ci l 3 , 4 11 complitt atpr ysf rdamages 'nex essof$10,00.0'does nots eciyanamounti an h a o ic 0 0' pf n 1 contoverygr at rt antemii um f rdier i j rs itonandt usar movigdef ndant 2 r s e e h h n m o v st u id ci y h ene 1 bear t e bur en ofpr vi g a su fci ntam ounti c ntov r y by t e pr ponder nce oft e 3 sh d on fi e n o r es h e a h 1 evi ence. M cc aa,33O F.Supp.2d at11 6. Becaus Nev da I w does notal w a pl i tf 4 d 4 e aa l o a n if 1 t pl ad specii damages gr at rt an $10, 00,no adv r e i f r nc shoul be t ken fom 5 oe fc eeh 0 e s ne e e d a r 1 a pl i tf' f i r t speciialy pl ad damages above $10,00 butbel w t e mi i um f r 6 an i s al e o f u fc l e 0 o h nm o 1 dier iyj rsditon. I.a 1150. 7 v st u i ci d t 1 8 A pl itf' cai sf rpunii edamagesand a t r eysf esmaybei c u ed i t et t l a ni s l m o f tv to n ' e n ld n h o a 1 us d t satsf t e mi i um amountf rdier iyj rsditon. I .at1148-50. Howev r 9 e o i y h nm o v st u i ci d e, 20 def ndantm u tpr duc evi ence t show t atpl i tf i mor I el t an nott r cover e soed o h a n if s ei yh k oe 21 ptniie damages and ator eyf es./ .A def ndantmayuse t eamounta pl i t f tac ed l tv tn e J e h an i a t h f 2 t hi cl i i a setl m entdem and I teras evi ence t att e am ounti c nt over y exceeds 2 o s am n te et d hh no r s 2 t e mii u frdie st j rs it n Co n B Petm ar I c,2 1 F.d 83 ,8 O ( t Ci. 3 h nm m o v r i u idc i . h . s t n . 8 3 7 4 9 h r y o , . 24 2002) W hent esetlmentdemandi r asonabl andteplitfdoesnotcont ndt att e . h te se e h an if ehh 25 am ountassi ned t hi cl i i hi dem and I terw as i fat d ordi honest t e def ndant an g o s am n s et nl e s ,h e c 26 meethi bur en bas d on t e dem and Iteral ne. / . butsee Fi patik ? Dufor ,No. sd e h et o J; t rc , f d z 27 Ci. .5:5CV128,2006 W L 839513,at* -4 ( . .W .Va.Mar h 28,2006)( olig t at VA O 3 ND c h dn h 28 pl it#s's tl m entdemand f r$100, 00 was i sufi i ntt es abl h t att e am oun i a n i e te o 0 n fc e o t i h h s tn 3 1 contovery ex eeds t e j rsditonalmii um when plitfs wer curenty demandig rsc h u i ci nm an if e r l n 2 $70,00) 0, 3 A pl i tf s r f salo s i ul t t cap damages at$75, 00 i notsu f i ntt es abl h a n ir e u t tp a e o 0s fi e o t i c s 4 r mo alu iditon.' l er a e s v r lea on whya pan i woul n tsiua e t t e e v j rs ci ' h e r e e a r s s F lit : d o t lt o h p 5 am ount i c nt over y, s t at a r f s lt stpul t , s andi g al ne, does not s ts y a nor s oh e u a o i ae t n o a if 6 def ndantsbur en o pr of' Slla b Nakr Cor .674 F.Supp.2d 1290,1293 ( . .Fl . e ' d f o . bi ' ' , l p, a MD a 7 2009)( iig Wiim s k BestBuy Co.I c.269 F.d 1316,1320( 1t Ci.2001)'see alo ctn la ' l . ,n , 3 1h r ) , s 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 3 Wl on k Unin Securt Lie Is.Co.250 F.Supp,2d 1 60,1265 n, ( .laho 2003) To l'o s. i fn y , 2 8D d . al w adef ndantosupporr mov lursditonbyshowigt atteplit f i dt stpult l o e t te a j i ci n h h an i al o i a e le t damages under$75, 00 woul shitt e bur ent t e pl i tf. W i on,25O F. o 0 d fh d o h a n if l s Supp. at 2d 1265 n. .Butt e def ndantal ays bear t e bur enofest bl hig r movalurs iton. 8 h e w sh d ain e s j idc i Def ndantmus est blshdier i j rsditon i hi petton f rr moval He cannot e t a i v st u i ci n s ii o e y . 1 Gause,980 F. d at566. 2 2 1 r l on m er conc usor al gatons i hi petton t att e am ounti contover y exc eds t e 4 ey e l yl i e n s ii h h n r s e h 1 j rs itonal ni um.Ther movigdef ndantmus r l onunderyigf csi hi petton. 5 u idc i mi m e n e t ey l n a t n s ii 1 How ev r t e di t i t c ur m ay, at i di cr ton,t eat f c s and ar um ent r i ed by a 6 e,h s rc o t t s ei s r at g as 1 def ndanti an opposii n t a m oton t r m and afer r m ovalas an am endm entt t e 7 e n to o i oe te oh 1 orgi alpettonf rr m oval Cohn, F.d at84O n. . 8 in ii o e . 281 3 1 1 9 Def ndant e essentalymak st o ar um ent agai str m and.Fist Def ndantar ues il ew g s ne r e g 20 t atPlitf' r questorpuniiedamagesi sufiintoest bishr mov lursditonbased h an i s e f f tv s fce t a i e a j i ci 21 ondier i becaus punivedamagesmayexceed$75,00.Sec nd,Def ndant guestat v st y e t i 0 o e ar h 22 Pli tf' r f salt stpul t t c p damages at$75, 00 i su#ii ntt est blsh r m ov l a n ifs e u o i a e o a 0s ce o a i e a 23 j rsditon.Bot ar ument f i.Def ndantbear t ebur enofest bl higt atteamount u i ci hg s al e sh d ain h h s 2 i contover y exc eds $75, 00 by a pr ponder nce oft e evi enc and cannot r l on 4n rs e 0 e a h de ey 25 concl sor al gatons. Pl i tf s r flalt stpul t t a damages cap does notalert e uyl i e a n if e ts o i a e o th 26 bur en.Themer possiiiyt atPlitC mayr coverpuniiedamagesi excessof 000 d e bi h a ni t e tv n $75, 27 i notenough t sats y Def ndan ' bur en. s o if e ts d 28 4 1 De e dan r l sonCoe a t As ur ntIc , 63 F. p . 1 6 ( . v2 0 ) f n te i e lm n t s a , n .4 Su p 2d 1 4 D Ne 0 6 . 2 2 I Co/man,t e cour hel tati had r movalurs iton based on dier iy because te ne h t dh t e j id ci v st h 3 pl i tf as ered a cl i f rpunii e dam ages, ch m ay be unl ied i bad f ih i sur nc a n if s t am o tv whi it n m at n a e 4 ac i ns, to and because t e pl i tf r f sed t s i ul t t att e val e ofhi case w as l s t an h a n if e u o tp a e h h u s esh 5 $75, 00. 463 F.Supp.2d at1168. The cour,however appl d t e wr ng s andar . The 0 t , ih o t e d 6 courthel t at i m ustappeart a I galcerai t t att e pl i tf coul not r cover above dh t oe t ny h h a n if d e 7 $75,00 i or ert r mand. I .Thi t s wasrj ctd byt e Nit Cicui,See Sanc ez, 0 n d oe d set ee e h nh r t h 8 1 2 F.d298, ( t Ci.1996) The Nit Cicuir asoned: O3 403 9 h r . nh r t e 9 I qurviw ,applc ton oft e ' onver e l galc dait 't s i cases wher t e n e ia i h' c se e n y'e t n eh 10 pl l tf ' com pl i t does not speci a pari ul r am ount of dam ages i a n ifs an f y ta c s I ' appr prat ,because i m ay r sul i an unw arant d expansi n off der l n o ie t e tn re o ea ll dier i j rsditon, Forexampl ,i a plitf act aly seeki g $10, 00 i v st u i ci y e f an if u l n 0n w oul f r e t e f der lcoud t exer l e J rsdi ton even I t er w as onl a d oc h e a o cs u l c i fh e y dam agesw er t fl a com pl i ti st t c ud w hi h di not eoi e an n ae o cd speci t e am ount fh y 1 2 ofdamagessough , t e def ndantwer t t en r m ove t e c se t f der l t and h e eoh e h q oe a cour, iaton oft e ' onver e l gplc rpit 't s i t jse clcum s ances t appl i c hc se gl ny e t n h r t 1 3 1 4 15 I . d 1 6 Iijlpossiii tatt e amouqti contovery exq qded (he j rsditonal e bly h h t n rs e t u i ci mll um) Thi r suli claryIconssent iht eI lswhihCongr s has nm , s e ts e l n it w t h l t c m es plced onbot r movaland dier iyjrsditon, a he v st u i ci The cour i Col m an r led on t e Supr m e Cour case ofBel 1.Pr f red Lie tn e ei h e t l eer f 1 Assur Soc ofMontom er AI .32O U. . ( 943) Colm an,463 F.Supp,2d at1168. 7 .. g y a, S 238 1 , e 1 I Bel,he plit fi d hi c mpl iti f der l tand speciial ask d f r$200,00 8 n lt a ni fl s o a n n e a cour fe fc l e o y 0 1 i act al 9 n u and punii e dam ages. 320 U. ,at239- 0. The Supr m e Cour not d t at t v S .4 e teh 20 r cover ofacualdamageswasik l I i dt $1,00,belw t et en $3,00 mii um e y t ie y i t o 0 me ohh 0 nm 21 am ount i - ont over y r quiem ent l .at240, The Supr m e Cour hel t att e di t i t -n c r s e r .d e t d h h s rc 22 cour hadj rs iton unlsst e amounti c ntovery,o a Igalcedait ,wasbelw t u id ci eh nor s t e ny o 2 $ , 0 .I . t2 1.Be au e pu iv dama esc ul mee t ejrs it n l ni u ,h 3 30 0 d a 4 c s nt e i g od t h u idci a mi m m t e o 24 Supr me Cour r vered t e dititc ur' dimis loft e c sef rIckofj rsditon.I . e t e s h src o t s s a h a o a s u i ci d 25 at241-43. . 26 27 The Supr m e Cour deal w ih a ver dif r ntsiuaton t an t e one i Col m an and e t tt y fe e tih h n e 28 i cl ar t e c ur need notc nsi ert em . s e ,h o t odh 2Def ndantalor l sonsever l - fj rs itoncases.Because Nit Cicuilw e s ei e a outo -u id ci nh r ta 5 1 t i case.laplitf pladsdamagesi exces oft ej rs itonal hs f an if e n s h u id ci amounti f der l t n e a cour, 2 hi good f ih al gatons ar gi en w ei htand di m i s l s onl appr prat i t er i a I gal s at l i e ev g s sai y o i e fh e s e 3 cerait t atheamountnc ntoveryi belw t ej rs itonal t ny h t i o r s s o h u id ci amount Sanc ez,1 2F.d . hO3 4 at402. l,as i Col m an and t i case,t e pl i t; pl ads an unspec fed am ounti s at f n e hs h ani e ii n te 5 c ur , t e def ndant m us pr ve t at t e am ount i con r ver y i i exc ss of t e oth e to hh n to s s n e h 6 jrsditonalmii um by apr ponder nceoft e evience t est bl hr movalursditon u i ci nm e a h d o ai e s j i ci 7 bas d on di er iy. I .a 404.Def ndanthas f ied t es abl h by a pr pon er nce t att e e v st d t e al o t i s e da hh 8 amoun -n- ontover yi gr at r han $75, 00.Ther f r , hi cas mus be r m andedt t e ti c r s s e e t 0 eoe t s e te oh 9 st t cour, ae t 1 0 I . CoNcu sl N V uo 1 1 1 2 13 14 15 Ac or igl,T I ORDERED tat an i' Mot nt Rema d (4)sGRANTED. c dn y I S h Plitf fs i o o n/i / DATED: s 241 day ofJune, 0 . Thi h 201 1 6 1 7 r .Jon t U N I ED STA S DI T R I T JUD G E T SC 18 1 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?