Adamson et al v. United States of America, Departmment of the Interior through its Bureau of Reclamation

Filing 125

ORDER. THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus I), 3:08-cv-00246-LDG-RAM - #541, #543, #544, #545, #546, #547, #548, #549, #550, #551; Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-cv-00285-LDG-RAM - #283, #285, #286, #287, #288, #289, #290, #291; Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-00649-LDG-RAM - #70; Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus II), 3:09-cv-00713-LDG-RAM - #175, #176, #178, #179, #180, #181, #182, #183, #184, #187; Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-00463-LDG-RAM - #15 and #27. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7

JUDY KROSHUS, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9

v.

10

3:08-cv-0246-LDG-RAM
(Kroshus I)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

11

Defendants.

12

ALICIA UHOUSE, et al.,

13

Plaintiffs,

14

v.

15

3:08-cv-0285-LDG-RAM

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THE INTERIOR, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17

BILL ADAMSON, et al.,

3:08-cv-0621-LDG-RAM
(Adamson I)

18
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
1

1

LARRY J. MOORE, et al.,

2

Plaintiffs,

3

v.

4

3:09-cv-0167-LDG-RAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

5

Defendants.

6
7

JAMES ADGETT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

3:09-cv-0649-LDG-RAM

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

11

JUDY KROSHUS, et al.,

3:09-cv-0713-LDG-RAM
(Kroshus II)

12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16

BILL ADAMSON, et al.,

17
18
19

3:09-cv-0715-LDG-RAM
(Adamson II)

Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

20

Defendant.

21

JASON AMES, et al.,

22

Plaintiffs,

23

v.

24

3:10-cv-0463-LDG-RAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

25

Defendant.

26
2

1

In conformity with the subdivision of pending motions for oral arguments and rulings

2

announced by the court in its order of March 16, 2011, and in the further interests of case

3

management of this litigation,

4

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without

5

prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned

6

proceedings:

7
8

Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus I), 3:08-cv-0246-LDG-RAM
TCID defendants’ motion for summary judgment regarding immunities of public
agencies (#541)

9
TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: duty to disclose (#543)
10
11

TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: dismissal of all plaintiffs who have not
timely complied with NRS 41.036(2), Nevada’s notice of claim statute (#544)

12

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: plaintiffs’ claims for personal
injury damages (#545)

13
TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: claim for fraud (#546)
14
TCID’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to NRS 41.033 (#547)
15
16

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: plaintiffs’ claims for emotional
distress damages (#548)

17

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: applicability of NRS 41.035(1),
Nevada’s statutory damages cap (#549)

18
19

TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: claims for “violation of due process”
(#550)

20

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: punitive damages (#551)

21
22

Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-cv-0285-LDG-RAM
TCID defendants’ motion for summary judgment regarding immunities of public
agencies (#283)

23
TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: duty to disclose (#285)
24
25

TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: dismissal of all plaintiffs who have not
timely complied with NRS 41.036(2), Nevada’s notice of claim statute (#286)

26
3

1

TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: causes of action against “Board of
Directors of Truckee Carson Irrigation District, as Individuals” (#287)

2
3

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: plaintiffs’ claims for personal
injury damages (#288)

4

TCID’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to NRS 41.033 (#289)

5

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: plaintiffs’ claims for emotional
distress damages (#290)

6
7
8
9

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: applicability of NRS 41.035(1),
Nevada’s statutory damages cap (#291)
Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG-RAM
United States’ motion for renewal and reinstatement of motion (#21) to dismiss
(#70)

10
Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus II), 3:09-cv-0713-LDG-RAM
11
12

TRC Engineers, Inc.’s etc. reinstatement of motion to dismiss and motion to strike
plaintiffs’ complaint (construed as a motion to reinstate said motions) (#175)

13

TCID defendants’ motion for summary judgment regarding immunities of public
agencies (#176)

14
TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: duty to disclose (#178)
15
16

TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: dismissal of all plaintiffs who have not
timely complied with NRS 41.036(2), Nevada’s notice of claim statute (#179)

17

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: plaintiffs’ claims for personal
injury damages (#180)

18
TCID’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to NRS 41.033 (#181)
19
20

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: plaintiffs’ claims for emotional
distress damages (#182)

21

TCID’s motion for partial summary judgment re: applicability of NRS 41.035(1),
Nevada’s statutory damages cap (#183)

22
23

TCID’s motion for summary judgment re: claims for “violation of due process”
(#184)

24

C.A.L. Investment Properties, Cal Eilrich and Dinah Eilrich’s renewal of motion to
strike and motion to dismiss documents (construed as a motion for renewal) (#187)

25
26
4

1

Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-0463-LDG-RAM

2

United States’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (#15)

3

Plaintiffs’ motion to convert motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment
(#27)

4
5
DATED this ______ day of September, 2011.
6
7
______________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
5