Brophy et al v. Day & Zimmerman Hawthorne Corporation
Filing
67
ORDER DISMISSING CASE re: 66 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. The parties stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear her or his own attorney's fees and costs incurred. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/7/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Case 3:10-cv-00035-RCJ -WGC Document 66
1
2
3
4
Filed 05/04/12 Page 1 of 2
KEN BICK
Nevad;:i Bar No. 002357
1005 Terminal Way, Suite 172
Reno, Nevada 89502
Telephone:
(775) 323-1213
Fax: cr75) 323-8766
Attorney for the Defendant
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
6
DISTRICT
7
COURT
OF NEVADA
8
9
10
SHANNON BROPHY, KHRISTINA
ARMSTEAD and MICHAEL
LIGHTFOOT,
Plaintiffs,
11
vs.
N
I'
...•
lC
12
11/ N
•• 0
13
••
~'5UlM
o
DAY & ZIMMERMANN
HAWTHORNE
CORPORATION,
a Nevada Corporation,
III ~ ~ ~
~ • >-
III •..•
u~~'O~
E
o ~ iii
III N
~
M
~lLIfzlil
1\1 z E • r.Jz •. gl'
ILl~ III '-'
lIl:
\11
0
0
...•
Defendants.
14
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREDJUDICE
16
The parties to this action, by and through their undersigned
It
counsel, hereby
17
18
stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear her or
19
11/
20
11/
21
11/
22
11/
23
11/
24
11/
25
26
11/
27
11/
28
11/
Case 3:10-cv-00035-RCJ -WGC Document 66
1
2
Filed 05/04/12 Page 2 of 2
its own attorney's fees and costs incurred.
DATED: This
yd'
dayof~2012.
3
4
~L
5
6
7
K'f:
Nevada Bar No. 00' 01
Attorney for the Pia inti s
227 Clay Street
Reno, Nevada 89501
Nevada Bar No. 002357
Attorney for the Defendant
1005 Terminal Way, Suite 172
Reno, Nevada 89502
8
9
ORDER
10
11
N
lC
12
~
"
Q)
1'1
"0
•••~'511l1'l
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: This_dayof of May, 2012.
7th day
. 2012.
13
°IDCIlO\~
III
' fl) 1'1
.,
•
~
IQ
7
.!!1IC~'tJ1'l
"':c
O~iU~1'l
14
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IV N
~1II':ZUl
15
.JzZ E g" 16
•. ,"
1II~lIIv
III
lC
III 0::
0
0
,.;
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?