Lisle v. McDaniel et al

Filing 68

ORDER - Defendants failed to file a motion to dismiss pursuant to the court's order 36 . Therefore, the defendants shall file an answer on or before Friday, January 27, 2012. Plaintiff's motions 66 & 67 are denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

KEVIN J. LISLE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
E.K. McDANIEL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
PRESENT:

3:10-CV-0064-LRH (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
January 12, 2012

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
On November 28, 2011, this court held a hearing concerning the defendants’ motion to
dismiss (#36). At that time, defendants made an oral motion to withdraw the motion to dismiss
which was granted. Id. The court allowed defendants an extension of time to Thursday, December
29, 2011 to file a motion to dismiss. Id.
Defendants have failed to file a motion to dismiss pursuant to the court’s order. Therefore,
the defendants shall file an answer on or before Friday, January 27, 2012. Thereafter, the court
will issue a scheduling order and set a case management conference.
Plaintiff’s motions for proper procedure and for an extension of time (#s 66 & 67) are
DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk