Rowell v. Palmer et al

Filing 69

ORDER - Petitioner's motion for merits decision (ECF No. 67 ) is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion for oral argument (ECF No. 68 ) is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

LAMARR ROWELL,

10
11
12

Petitioner,

Case No. 3:10-cv-00098-LRH-WGC
ORDER

v.
JACK PALMER, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15

Petitioner has filed a motion for merits decision (ECF No. 67) and a motion for oral

16

argument (ECF No. 68). He does nothing other than try to relitigate issues that the court already

17

has decided.

18
19
20
21

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for merits decision (ECF No. 67)
is DENIED.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for oral argument (ECF No. 68) is
DENIED.

22

IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue.

23

DATED this 19th day of October, 2018.

24
______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1