Jones v. Skolnik et al
Filing
209
ORDER adopting and accepting 200 Report and Recommendation and denying 161 Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
CHRISTOPHER JONES,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
3:10-cv-00162-LRH-VPC
ORDER
14
15
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P.
16
Cooke (#2001 ) entered on August 23, 2013, recommending denying Plaintiff’s Partial Motion for
17
Summary Judgment (#161) filed on February 25, 2013. Plaintiff filed his Objections to Report and
18
Recommendation by U.S. Magistrate Judge (#203) on September 5, 2013. Defendants have not filed
19
a response to Plaintiff’s Objections. This action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
20
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court
21
for the District of Nevada.
22
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
23
Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to
24
28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s
25
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
Report and Recommendation (#200) entered on August 23, 2013, should be adopted and accepted.
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
3
(#200) entered on August 23, 2013, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff’s Partial Motion for
4
Summary Judgment (#161) is DENIED.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED this 25th day of September, 2013.
8
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?