Jones v. Skolnik et al

Filing 540

ORDER the Attorney Generals Office shall direct an investigator to review the ex-felon registry and provide the same limited information to plaintiff for Jose Alcocer and Isidro Lemus-Leon no later than Friday, October 7, 2016. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel ECF No. 506 is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 09/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CHRISTOPHER JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) PRESENT: 3:10-CV-0162-LRH (VPC) MINUTES OF THE COURT September 26, 2016 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff filed a motion to compel compliance with subpoena duces tecum directed to Sheriff Joseph Lombardo of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department to produce the exfelon registry contact information for Jose Alcocer and Isidro Lemus-Leon (ECF No. 506) . Sheriff Lombardo specially appeared in opposition to the motion to compel (ECF No. 510), and plaintiff replied (ECF No. 512). Having considered the parties’ arguments and this Court’s previous order that the Attorney General’s Office provide the last known addresses for Kevin Smith and Michael Washington (see ECF No. 507), the Court orders that the Attorney General’s Office shall direct an investigator to review the ex-felon registry and provide the same limited information to plaintiff for Jose Alcocer and Isidro Lemus-Leon. The Attorney General’s Office shall provide this information to plaintiff no later than Friday, October 7, 2016. Based upon the foregoing, plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 506) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?