Schiro v. Clark et al

Filing 78

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 6/27/2012. To the extent that Ps 74 objection/reconsideration to Honorable Magistrate Judges doc #73 ruling can be construed as a motion for reconsideration, the mot ion is DENIED. Further, Ps 77 motion to strike Ds opposition to the objection/reconsideration is DENIED. To the extent that Ps objection/reconsideration can be construed as an objection to the magistrate judges ruling, that objection is pending before the District Court for review. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

KENNETH SCHIRO,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STEPHEN CLARK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
PRESENT:

3:10-CV-203-RCJ (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
June 27, 2012

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
To the extent that plaintiff’s “objection/reconsideration to Honorable Magistrate Judge’s doc
#73 ruling” (#74) can be construed as a motion for reconsideration, the motion is DENIED. Further,
plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ opposition to the objection/reconsideration (#77) is
DENIED.
To the extent that plaintiff’s objection/reconsideration can be construed as an objection to
the magistrate judge’s ruling, that objection is pending before the District Court for review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk