Pierce v. Skoinik

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 3/25/2011. By Deputy Clerk: Lisa Mann. IT IS ORDERED that the second (duplicative) motion for TRO/Preliminary Injunction 9 is DENIED AS MOOT. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

-VPC Pierce v. Skoinik

Doc. 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

SPENCER PIERCE,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) ______________________________) PRESENT:

3:10-CV-0239-ECR (VPC) MINUTES OF THE COURT March 25, 2011

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

DEPUTY CLERK:

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: The court has reviewed plaintiff's motion for TRO/preliminary injunction (#9), defendants' response (#15), plaintiff's letter (#17), and the court's screening order (#8). It appears to the court, that plaintiff's motion for TRO/preliminary injunction was inadvertently filed on the docket twice (#s 7 & 9). Plaintiff states in his letter that he should not have two motions for TRO/preliminary injunction on file, and that his original motion for TRO/preliminary injunction (#7) was denied (#8). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the second (duplicative) motion for TRO/preliminary injunction motion (#9) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Dockets.Justia.com