Morrison v. Bannister et al
Filing
5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the failure to plaintiff to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 09/15/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Morrison v. Bannister et al
Doc. 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 BRUCE BANNISTER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EUGENE N. MORRISON, #1029340 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3:10-cv-0284-LRH-VPC ORDER
This is a pro se civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 20, 2010, the court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (docket #3). In the same order, plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies of the original complaint (id.). The court expressly warned plaintiff that failure to respond to this court's order would result in dismissal of this action. The order was served on plaintiff at his address of record. More than the allotted time has elapsed and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order in any manner. Accordingly, this entire action is dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the failure of plaintiff to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. DATED this 15th day of September, 2010.
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?