Beall v. City of Reno

Filing 7

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for the failure of plaintiff to comply with this court's 4 order to file an app to proceed ifp. FURTH ORD that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/26/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM) Modified on 8/27/2010 to correct file date(PM).

Download PDF
Beall v. City of Reno Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This is a pro se civil rights action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff failed to submit either the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis on the required form. By order filed June 30, 2010, the court ordered plaintiff to file a completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days. (Docket #4). The court expressly warned plaintiff that failure to respond to this court's order would result in dismissal of this action. The order was served on plaintiff at his address of record. More than the allotted time has elapsed and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order in any manner. Accordingly, this entire action will be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for the failure of plaintiff to comply with this court's order to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. /// /// vs. CITY OF RENO, Defendant. RONALD W. BEALL, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3:10-cv-00296-LRH-RAM ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. DATED this 26th day of August, 2010. LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?