Lee v. Enterprise Leasing Company-West, LLC

Filing 56

PROTECTIVE ORDER re 53 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

BOWEN HALL
Dan C. Bowen (SBN 1555)
555 South Center Street
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
Gregory D. Call (admitted pro hac vice)
Janine L. Scancarelli (admitted pro hac vice)
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Enterprise Leasing
Company-West, LLC and Vanguard Car Rental USA, LLC

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13
14
15

LYDIA LEE and CAROLYN
BISSONETTE, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

16
17
18
19

Case No. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)
STIPULATEDSTIPULATED
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
[PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
PROTECTIVE ORDER

v.
ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANYWEST, LLC, a Delaware LLC, and
VANGUARD CAR RENTAL USA, LLC,
a Delaware LLC,
Defendants.

20
21
22

1.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

23

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

24

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public

25

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.

26

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated

27

Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on

28

all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-1-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment

2

under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section

3

12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential

4

information under seal; Local Rule 10-5(b) sets forth the procedures that must be followed when

5

a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

6

2.

7
8
9

DEFINITIONS
2.1

Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.
2.2

“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

10

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule

11

of Civil Procedure 26(c).

12
13
14
15
16

2.3

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as

well as their support staff).
2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that

it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

17

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,

18

testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or

19

responses to discovery in this matter.

20

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

21

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a

22

consultant in this action.

23
24
25
26
27
28

2.7

House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.8

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.9

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-2-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.

2
3

2.10

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).

4
5

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

2.11

Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.

6

2.12

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

7

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

8

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and

9

subcontractors.

10
11

2.13

Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”

12

2.14

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

13

Producing Party.

14

3.

SCOPE

15

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

16

(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2)

17

all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

18

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

19

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

20

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a

21

Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as

22

a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the

23

public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party

24

prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who

25

obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating

26

Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

27

4.

28

DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-3-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court

2

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all

3

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after

4

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,

5

including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to

6

applicable law.

7

5.

8

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

9

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care

10

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

11

The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents,

12

items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material,

13

documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

14

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

15

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are

16

shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

17

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary

18

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

19

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated

20

for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other

21

Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

22

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

23

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

24

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so

25

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

26

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

27

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but

28

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-4-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only a

2

portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

3

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

4

margins).

5

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection

6

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which

7

material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all

8

of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the

9

inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party

10

must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order.

11

Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the

12

“CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or

13

portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly

14

identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

15

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the

16

Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other

17

proceeding, all protected testimony.

18

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other

19

tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container

20

or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a

21

portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the

22

extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

23

5.3

Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

24

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

25

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

26

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

27

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-5-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1
2

6.

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

3

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

4

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

5

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

6

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

7

original designation is disclosed.

8
9

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis

10

for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written

11

notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this

12

specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in

13

good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other

14

forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In

15

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality

16

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the

17

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,

18

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next

19

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or

20

establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in

21

a timely manner.

22

6.3

Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

23

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under

24

Local Rule 7-2 within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties

25

agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each

26

such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has

27

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by

28

the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-6-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each

2

challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a

3

confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to

4

the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to

5

this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has

6

complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

7

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

8

Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

9

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to

10

sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to

11

file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the

12

material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s

13

designation until the court rules on the challenge.

14

7.

15

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

16

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

17

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

18

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

19

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL

20

DISPOSITION).

21

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and

22

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

23

7.2

Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered

24

by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

25

information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

26
27

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as
employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-7-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

2

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

3

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving

4

Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the

5

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

6

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is

7

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

8

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

9

(d) the court and its personnel;

10

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and

11

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

12

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

13

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

14

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A),

15

unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed

16

deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately

17

bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this

18

Stipulated Protective Order.

19

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or

20

other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

21

8.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN
OTHER LITIGATION
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party
must:
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a
copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-8-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this

2

Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

3
4

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

5

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

6

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as

7

“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order

8

issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party

9

shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material –

10

and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving

11

Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

12

9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN
THIS LITIGATION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

(a)

The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in

this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in
connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order.
Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking
additional protections.
(b)

In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a

Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement
with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:
(1)

promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party

that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a NonParty;
(2)

promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated

Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific
description of the information requested; and
(3)

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

make the information requested available for inspection by the
-9-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

Non-Party.

2

(c)

If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14

3

days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the

4

Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely

5

seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession

6

or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

7

determination by the court.1 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

8

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

9

10.

10

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

11

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

12

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

13

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the

14

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

15

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

16

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

17

11.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This
provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery
order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of
Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a
communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product

The purpose of this provision is to alert the interested parties to the existence of
confidentiality rights of a Non-Party and to afford the Non-Party an opportunity to protect its
confidentiality interests in this court.
1

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-10-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order

2

submitted to the court.

3

12.

4
5

MISCELLANEOUS
12.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the court in the future.

6

12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

7

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

8

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

9

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered

10

by this Protective Order.

11

12.3

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party

12

or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in

13

the public record in this action any Protected Material. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule

14

or prior court order, papers filed with the court under seal shall be accompanied by a

15

contemporaneous motion for leave to file those documents under seal, and shall be filed

16

consistent with the court’s electronic filing procedures in accordance with Local Rule 10-5(b).

17

Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal

18

bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court.

19

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).

20

13.

21

FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each

22

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such

23

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,

24

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

25

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must

26

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the

27

Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all

28

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has

C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-11-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or

2

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to

3

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts,

4

legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work

5

product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected

6

Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to

7

this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

9
10

DATED: November 30, 2012

11
12
13

/s/ David Robertson
David Robertson (SBN 1001)
Robert D Williamson (SBN 9932)
ROBERTSON, JOHNSON, MILLER &
WILLIAMSON
Susan S. Thomas
Arthur Stock (admitted pro hac vice)
BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C.

14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

16
17

DATED: November 30, 2012

18
19

Gregory D. Call (admitted pro hac vice)
Janine L. Scancarelli (admitted pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP

20
21

Attorneys for Defendants

22
23
24
25
26

/s/ Dan C. Bowen
Dan C. Bowen (SBN 1555)
BOWEN HALL

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _____________________________________________________________
DATED: December 5. 2012.
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-12-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of __________________

4

____________________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under

5

penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order

6

that was issued by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada California on

7

________, 2012, in the case of Lee v. Enterprise Leasing Company – West, LLC, Case No. 3:10-

8

cv-00326-LRH-(WGC). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated

9

Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to

10

sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in

11

any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any

12

person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

13

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

14

District of Nevada for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even

15

if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

16

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

17

________________________________________________________________ [print or type full

18

address and telephone number] as my agent for service of process in connection with this action

19

or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

20
21

Date: _________________________________

22

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

23

Printed name: ______________________________
[printed name]

24
25
26

Signature: __________________________________
[signature]

27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

-13-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

SFACTIVE-902900854.1

PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER;
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-00326-LRH-(WGC)