Alexander v. State Of Nevada et al

Filing 114

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 10/16/2014, denying/denying as moot 112 Motion for Issuance of Summons. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA NARVIEZ V. ALEXANDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF NEVADA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) 3:10-cv-00429-RCJ-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT October 16, 2014 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Summons. Plaintiff requests the court to issue and serve summonses on unserved defendants Debra Brooks, Martin Dooley, James Fowler, Jeffrey Patterson, Anthony Scillia, Larry Wuest, Mr. Lamprich, "and John and Jane Does 1-10." (Doc. # 112.) On October 10, 2014, the court issued an order for service upon defendants Brooks, Dooley, Fowler, Patterson and Scillia. (Doc. # 104.) Therefore, Plaintiff's motion with regard to these defendants is DENIED AS MOOT. The order also noted that service would not be attempted on Larry Wuest as, according to Defendants' counsel, there is no current or former NDOC employee by that name. (Id.) Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as to defendant Wuest. Count IX of Plaintiff's Complaint, which appears to be the only count wherein defendant "Mr. Lamprich" is identified, was dismissed with prejudice in the court's screening order. (Doc. # 9.) Plaintiff's motion requesting service on defendant Lamprich is DENIED. The court declines to issue and serve any defendants identified as "John and Jane Does 1-10." Plaintiff's motion with respect to service on these defendants is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?