United States of America v. $39,680 in United States Currency

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 19 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order and the Answer 5 is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
i? t ï . e . Fk g lg E rZ ) N EE . . Fg ëyg lg y ; S R S ON EVD slns ty FTl (rgzt tl E/ à tls ) j aj ! i l 2 . FEg 2 5 g j gj . Bt .: g $ Z E' U (SEZ C ti' LF SI T II û l L I jl gl (F hw Atà u sr ) i ) DEFU' '! ' Y i . 4 5 UNI TED STA TES D I STR I CO UR T CT ol rm c' o l NEVAD A se r p : 6 i : E 7 8 UNI STATESOFAMERI TED CA, fl i if ka ntf, vs . 9 i l i ! $39, 0I UNI STATESCURRENCY, 68 N TED l 0 oe e nt f nda . 1 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:0- - IRCJ VPC l cv 0043 - - ORDER 1 2 ' Thics aie o t tesiueo $ 96 0ateAmta Saini Re o Ne a a s ae rss u ofh ez r f 3 ,8 th rk tt n n , v d . o : l TheCou tpr vi l de e t Gov nmen ' M otont Sti Ans r( No. wih 3 r e ousy nid he er ts i o rke we ECF 9) t out i 1 prj c a gr tdCl ma s Motonsf Le vet Fi Lat Pl di ( No .l 1 . 4 eudie nd ane ai nt' i or a o l e ea ng ECF s 0, 2) e 1 Be a ecli shalsld atmel An we , t cour f 5 c us amant c e i y s r he t ound t i had di eton t per i a hat t scr i o m t 1 lt veiidcai se Unie St e v 1 Yuk Det Hou e ,77 F. l 32,1 ( h 6 ae rfe l m.b e td ats . 982 on la s boat 4 2d 4 436 9t ' 1 Ci,1 ) Th Cour r e 7 r 985 . e t uld: United States of America v. $39,680 in United States Currency Doc. 22 : 18 w ihi f een days each Cl m ant shal fl i o t r d a veri ed cl m, t n ourt ai l ie nt he ecor fi ai I 9 20 une umb e by an ot rdoc t,a whih:() s cii te prpery nc erd y he umens nd c i pe fes h o t cli d;( ieniist Cl ma a sae hi itrs i t pr ry;( i ame 2) d tfe he ai nt nd tts s neet n he opet 3) s sgne by t Cl ma t un r p naly of q ruy;a d ( i s red on t i d he ai n de e t ej r n 4) s ev he G over nments ator ' t ney. Faiur t adher s rc l t t s diec i w il r ul i l eo e t lty o hi r tve l es t n r c i r ton oft e Gov nm e ' m oton t s rk . e onsde a i h er nts i o ti e l ' E 2l . 22 ( de 4:5-20, c 29 2o1 ,EcFxo.l ) si e da ltr cli ntJ me sii gs or r 1 oe . , o 7. xten ys ae, ama a s rvon a Gld aVe ii Cl m sa i e rfed ai ttng: 23 ! l I ; 2 4 25 1 Thepr pe t Iam cli ng i $3 68 00 ... nUntd SttsCu r nc . o ry ami s 9, 0. i ie ae re y whih wa wr gf l t e fom t e p s of my s ? SONGKHAM c s on uly ak n r h eron on SI V ON G SA , Re o Polc ofi e son Fe r r 9,2 0, hle o a A mta RI by n i e fc r b ua y 01 w l n n rk tai r n; ' i I I Dockets.Justia.com i I l i i '% n 1 ; l 1 ! ! ! E i l i l . 2 2. Ia J M ES slu vox csA a t U. curen y ha be e r t d t m A l nd he s. r c d en ntus e o my s , SON GK HAM sluv oN c sA i co c i wih ourf m iy bus n s , on l n nne ton t a l i e s on whi he wasr ur n w h t e c r c w a wr uly s z d; ch et ni g en l uren y s ongf l eie a 3 ' : p ' 4 5 ( everfe cli , a I 20ll ECFNo.1 ) se iid am J n. 4, , 8. . cl mantr l t s rcty adher t t tme lm i gi by t Cour. M or i poranty, ai aied o ti l e o he i i t ven he t em t l c l m anthas nots fci l i ii hi i er ti t cur ency ot t t decl e t he ai ufi enty dentfed s nt es n he r her han o ar hat 6 ow ns i. A bar cl m ofowner hi s i i t fr tr r ent butnott s t e ai s p atsfes he is equiem , he econd. C l mant ai 7 . has noti ii t s ce oft m oney ot t t vaguel st e i i connect t a çf iy dentfed he our he her han o y at t s ed o tam l j i : $ 8 9 ' b i es . Th r a i oft e c ni t t m on y i a go i c ton w h tt tb i s m a us n s' e e cton h a ne o he ' e s od ndi a i a ha us ne s y co itof ns s . CO NC LUSIO N ' I i 1 ! l o 11 1 2 I I HEREBY ORDERED t tt M oton t Re on i r( No.l i GRANTED TS ha he i o c sde ECF 9) s a d t eAn we ( No.5)i STRI n h s r ECF s CKEN . . I I SO ORD ERED. T S . 11. i 1 ! ; 1 3 1 4 l 5 ! ! ! D at t s 25t day ofFebr ed hi h ual , ' ! i 1 6 17 1 8 RO RT C . JON ES Unie t es Di rctJudge t at sti . . i ' i 1 9 20 ; i i 1 21 22 ! 23 24 i i ! I ! 2 5 Pag 2 of 2 e i 1 i :

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?