Luevano v. Reid et al

Filing 9

ORDER DENYING 8 Motion for Reconsideration. This action has been and remains closed. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 10/15/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
$ . #* ! 1 2 3 4 5 UN IT E D STA T E S DISTRIC T C O U R T 6 7 J I E LUEV A N O , AM 8 D IST R I T O F N E V A D A C P e ii ne , tto r 9 V S. 2: 0 cv- 0503- C R - A M 1- 0 E R 1 0 O R D ER 1 HA R R Y REI ,e al, 1 D t. 1 2 l3 Re pondent . s s 1 4 Thi cl sed pr se m andam us ac i n by a prsoneri cust dy i Texas comes bef r so o to i n on oe 1 t e Co d on pe ion rsmo i n ( 8 f rr c nsd r t n. Th tm e f rs e ig r l fun er 5h u t i e ' to # ) o e o ie a i t o e i o e kn e i d e 1 Rul 59 hasexpied, t e m otont er f r necessarl arsesunderRul 60oft e Feder l 6 e r and h i h eo e ii y e h a 1 Rul s ofCi i Pr cedur . 7 e v! o e 18 Luevano v. Reid et al Pettoner Jai e Luevano fl d a petton f r a wrt of m andam us nam i g as ii m i e i io i n Doc. 9 1 r spondent Unied St t s Senat r Hary Rei and ' l Paso, Texas, Entapm ent , 9e s t ae o r d i E r s 20 Coruptons,et ,aI' He soughta wrtofm andam us t com pel m uli ititI i aton panel ri c. ' i o a td s rc i g i t 21 t r ve alo hi c s sfld i o h r eder l d/ rsa e c u t an diqu lyt ej dg s i o e iw I f s a e i n t e f a an o t t o rs d s a i h u e n e f 2 t ose cases f rbi s, He i cl ded an al gaton t atf der l at t s and r l s needed t be 2h oa nu l i h e a st u e e ue o 23 r f r ed.Pet i nerf dher l gedt athewasunl w f l convit d i a crm i al oceedi g. e om io t u al e h a ul y c e n i n pr n 24 Hi c r underyi g chal nge was diect d t t e constt tonaly cft atc nviton. s oe ln l e r e oh iu i i t h o ci 25 27 The Coud dim ised t e acton wihoutpr j die due t t e mulil def ct i t e ss h it eu c oh tpe e s n h Pet i ner subm i a Sept m ber 1 ,2010,com m i sar pur hase r cei t t at he io t t s e O sy c e ph 26 paper pr sent d. Judgmentwas ent r d on Augus 16 2010. se e ee t 28 m ai t i s dem onstat s t at he i unabl t pay t e fl g f e. The r cei t does not nan re h s eo h ii e n ep Dockets.Justia.com A . 1 under i e t e basi f r he prordi m isal Pettonerdi not t erpayt e r quied $350. 0 mn h sot i s s . ii d eih her 0 2 fl g f e orsubm i a pr pery com pl t d appl aton t pr ceed i f r a paupers on t e in e i t ol ee ii oo c n om i h 3 Cour' r quied f r f ra prsonerpauperapplcaton,wih aI r quied atachm ent and ts e r o m o i ii t Ie r t s 4 acknowl dgm ent .Subm isi n ofa com m i sal r cei tafert e di m i sal e s so s e p t h s s does notchange 5 t e f c t atpettonerdi notsubm it e r quied pauperappl aton and pr persuppori g h a th ii d th e r ii c o tn 6 fnanci lm at ral w ih hi paper i ii l . Norwoul a com m isar r c it c ns iut a i a ei s t s s n ta l y d s y e e p o tt e 7 pr pery- uppored pauperappl aton even i i had been subm i ed w ih t e paper i ii l . o ls t ii c ft t t th s nta l y 8 Pettonerf rherur es t atSenat rRei ' i m uniy can be waied. Pettonerci s ii ut gh o ds m t v ii t e 9 no apposi aut ort suppodi g,orbasi f r such an al ged waier The Senat rcl ar t e h iy n s o, l e v. o el y 1 has i m uni agai stt i ac i n,and t e r m ai i g r spondentnam ed does notconstt t 0 m t y n h s to h e nn e iu e 1 aj r ial sonsu j c t sut 1 u i c per d be t o i. 1 2 1 4 Pettoners r m ai i g cont ntons ar nons nsial and/ r f nciul i cldi g hi ii ' e n n ei e ec o a f,n u n s The m oton does notdiecty addr ss t e r m ai i g bases f rdim i sal The Cour i rl e h e nn o ss. t 1 al gatons ofa ' as m assie f m i rng m ob,i c. and an ' nt r rse ki gdom em pie, 3 li e 't v v a li y n' ' e e pi n r' ' 1 f dher not d:( )t atneihert i Cour nora muli ititIiaton panelhas appel t 5u e ah t hs t tds rc ig i t le a 1 j rs it no er t ereder l dsat c udst is ew r sof dam usdiqu lyn j dg s 6 u id c i v o h f a an t e o o o s u i man t s a i ig u e f 1 f ral ged bis and/ rot er iediectng t e actons r quest d bypettoner and ( )t at 7ol e a o h ws r i h ie e ii ' , bh, 1 as pettoner was seeki g t chal nge t e val i of a c nviton t at has not been 8 ii no l e h it dy o ci h 1 overur ed,hi m andam uspettonwas bared byHec v. 9 tn s ii r k Hum phr y, U. . e 512 S 477,11 S. t 4 C. 2 23 41 29 L. d.d 383 ( 9 4) 0 61 E2 19 . 21 Bot t e i ii lacton and t e m oton f rr consi er ton ar w hol f iol us. Thi h h n ta i h i oe d ai e l rv o y s 22 acton has been and r m ai s cl sed. i eno 23 I THEREFORE I ORDERED t a t e mo in ( 8)f rr c n ier t n i DENI D. T S h th to # o e o sd a i s o E 2 4 25 D T D:() AE 1F, zo) , o 2 6 27 28 C . w. Unied St t s Dit itJudge t a e s rc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?