People Of The State Of California v. Villalobos et al
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 9/12/2011. Debtors-Appellants' 34 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal is DENIED. Debtor-Appellants may, however, seek a stay of the state court proceedings through the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENO, NEVADA
IN RE:
)
)
ALFRED J.R. VILLALOBOS, an
)
individual,
)
)
Debtor.
)
___________________________________)
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
)
CALIFORNIA, EX REL., EDMUND G.
)
BROWN JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
)
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
)
)
Appellant,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ALFRED J.R. VILLALOBOS and ARVCO
)
CAPITAL RESEARCH, LLC,
)
)
Appellees.
)
)
PRESENT:
Deputy Clerk:
3:10-cv-00598-ECR-RAM
MINUTES OF THE COURT
DATE: September 9, 2011
EDWARD C. REED, JR.
COLLEEN LARSEN
U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Reporter:
NONE APPEARING
Counsel for Plaintiff(s)
NONE APPEARING
Counsel for Defendant(s)
NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS
Debtors-Appellants’ Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (#34) is DENIED.
Debtor-Appellants request a stay of the enforcement of this Court’s Amended
Order (#24) and Judgment (#25) pending appeal. The basis for the requested
stay is that the state court action exempted from the automatic bankruptcy
stay by our Amended Order (#24) “will be extraordinarily expensive, divert
Debtors’ limited time and resources away from rebuilding their businesses
and revenue stream, and substantially undermine reorganization.” (Mot. to
Stay at 11 (#34).) We do not find that the potential harm in this case
rises to the level of irreparable harm ordinarily required for a stay
pending appeal.
Debtor-Appellants may, however, seek a stay of the state court
proceedings through the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By
2
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?