Pratt v. Minnix et al

Filing 43

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the 34 R&R is adopted and accepted. FURTH ORD that Ds' 22 Motion for Summary is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/7/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8

JACOB RAMIE PRATT,

9

3:10-CV-615-RCJ-VPC

Plaintiff,
ORDER

10

v.

11

JAMES MINNIX, et al.,

12

Defendants.
___________________________________

13
14

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke

15

(#34) entered on July 1, 2011, recommending the Court deny the Motion for Summary Judgment (#22)

16

filed by Defendants Terrance Deeds, Cameron Horsley, Juston Perkins, and Joshua Postma (collectively

17

“Defendants”). No objection to the Report and Recommendation was filed.

18

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case and has fully considered the pleadings

19

and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

20

and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

21

(#34) entered on July 1, 2011, should be adopted and accepted.

22
23
24
25

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#34)
entered on July 1, 2011, is adopted and accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#22) is DENIED.
This 7th day November, 2011.
DATED: this 22nd day ofof December, 2011.

26
27
28

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE