Navas v. Baca et al

Filing 153

USCA Docketing Letter re pro se petition for Writ of Mandamus. USCA Case Number 19-71100 assigned. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court

May 07, 2019

No.:
19-71100
D.C. No.: 3:10-cv-00647-RCJ-WGC
Short Title: Julio Navas v. USDC-NVR
Dear Petitioner/Counsel
A petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition has been received in the Clerk's
Office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court
of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. Always
indicate this docket number when corresponding with this office about your case.
If the U.S. Court of Appeals docket fee has not yet been paid, please make
immediate arrangements to do so. If you wish to apply for in forma pauperis status,
you must file a motion for permission to proceed in forma pauperis with this court.
Pursuant to FRAP Rule 21(b), no answer to a petition for writ of mandamus and/or
prohibition may be filed unless ordered by the Court. If such an order is issued, the
answer shall be filed by the respondents within the time fixed by the Court.
Pursuant to Circuit Rule 21-2, an application for writ of mandamus and/or
prohibition shall not bear the name of the district court judge concerned. Rather,
the appropriate district court shall be named as respondent.