de Grise v. Bagus et al
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Ps 13 motion to proceed, which the court construes as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, is GRANTED. P shall have thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. FURTH ORD that Ps 15 motion t o proceed, 16 motion to transfer venue, 20 motion to proceed, and 22 motion to proceed are DENIED. FURTH ORD that Ds 11 motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9
BENJAMIN W. DE GRISE,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
COLLEEN BAGUS; et al.,
13
Defendants.
3:10-cv-0662-LRH-VPC
ORDER
14
15
16
Before the court is defendants Colleen Bagus (“Bagus”) and Carol Stewart’s (“Stewart”)
motion to dismiss. Doc. #11.1
17
Also before the court are pro se plaintiff Benjamin W. de Grise’s (“de Grise”) motion to
18
proceed in a Bivens action (Doc. #13); motion to proceed with a Sixth Amendment violation
19
(Doc. #15); motion to change venue (Doc. #16); motion to proceed in fraud (Doc. #20); and motion
20
to proceed in state tort (Doc. #22).
21
I.
22
23
24
Facts and Background
This action stems from the denial of de Grise’s unemployment benefits by defendants Bagus
and Stewart, employees of Nevada’s Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation.
On October 21, 2010, de Grise filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against
25
26
1
Refers to the court’s docket number.
1
defendants. Doc. #6. In response, defendants filed the present motion to dismiss. Doc. #11.
2
Thereafter, de Grise filed a series of motions he styled as motions to proceed (Doc. ##13, 15, 20,
3
22) and a motion to change venue (Doc. #16). The court shall address the motions below.
4
II.
5
Motions to Proceed
The court has reviewed de Grise’s motions to proceed and notes that in each motion de
6
Grise alleges additional claims for relief against Bagus and Stewart. Therefore, the court shall
7
construe these motions as motions for leave to file an amended complaint and address them
8
accordingly.
9
A party may amend its pleadings after a responsive pleading has been filed by leave of
10
court. FED . R. CIV . P. 15(a)(2). Leave of court to amend should be freely given when justice so
11
requires and when there is no undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive on the part of the moving
12
party. See Wright v. Incline Village General Imp. Dist., 597 F.Supp.2d 1191 (D. Nev. 2009); DCD
13
Programs, LTD v. Leighton, 883 F.2d 183 (9th Cir. 1987).
14
Here, de Grise seeks leave to amend his complaint to add several additional causes of action
15
not pled in his initial complaint. See Doc. ##13, 15, 20, 22. The court has reviewed the record in
16
this action and finds that there is no undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive on behalf of de Grise
17
in requesting leave to amend his complaint. Further, the court finds that the matter is early in
18
litigation and that the defendants would not be prejudiced by allowing amendment. Accordingly,
19
the court shall grant de Grise’s first motion to proceed and grant him leave to amend his complaint.
20
The remaining motions to proceed shall be denied as duplicative.
21
III.
22
23
24
25
26
Motion to Change Venue
In his motion to change venue, de Grise seeks to transfer this action to the unofficial
southern district for the District of Nevada. See Doc. #16.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404, the court may transfer any civil action to another district in
which it could have been brought for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the
2
1
interest of justice. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Here, de Grise has made no showing that a transfer of
2
venue to the unofficial southern district would be more convenient for the parties in this action. In
3
fact, de Grise recognizes that a transfer may be more difficult for the individual defendants.
4
Accordingly, the court shall deny de Grise’s motion to transfer venue.
5
IV.
6
7
Motion to Dismiss
Because the court is granting de Grise leave to file an amended complaint, the court shall
deny defendants’ present motion to dismiss without prejudice.
8
9
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed (Doc. #13), which the
10
court construes as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, is GRANTED. Plaintiff
11
Benjamin W. de Grise shall have thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint that alleges, in one
12
document, all causes of action against defendants and shall serve a copy of the amended complaint
13
upon defendants in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed (Doc. #15); motion to
15
transfer venue (Doc. #16); motion to proceed (Doc. #20); and motion to proceed (Doc. #22) are
16
DENIED.
17
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. #11) is DENIED
without prejudice.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
DATED this 25th day of August, 2011.
21
22
23
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?