Crawford v. Battrick et al

Filing 11

ORDER. Before the Court is plaintiff's letter construed as a Motion for Clarification 10 which seeks confirmation of the date of remand of this matter to the Seventh Judicial DistrictCourt of Nevada. The Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk shall send the parties a copy of the Court'sOrder for remand 9 . The defendants shall be servedelectronically, the plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (Ack'd) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Crawford v. Battrick et al

Doc. 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 ROBERT CRAWFORD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 WILLIAM BATTRICK, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court is plaintiff's letter construed as a Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 17 10), which seeks confirmation of the date of remand of this matter to the Seventh Judicial District 18 Court of Nevada. The Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk shall send the parties a copy of the Court's 19 Order for remand entered December 20, 2010 (ECF No. 9). The defendants shall be served 20 electronically, the plaintiff via U.S. Mail. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED this 16th day of March 2011. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 3:10-cv-0683-ECR-RAM ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2