Forsythe v. Brown et al

Filing 168

ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's # 141 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 JAMES W. FORSYTHE, et al., 8 Plaintiff, 3:10-CV-00716-RCJ(VPC) ORDER 9 v. 10 JOSEPH BROWN, et al., 11 Defendants. ___________________________________ 12 13 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (#141) entered on February 6, 2012. 14 Plaintiff filed Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#148) and Defendants 15 filed an Opposition to Objections (#152). 16 The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of 17 the Plaintiffs, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The district court may accept, reject, or modify in 19 whole or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 20 The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#141) entered on 21 February 6, 2012 is adopted and accepted. 22 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#141) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: this 18th day of May, 2012. 26 27 28 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?