Forsythe v. Brown et al
Filing
168
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's # 141 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
JAMES W. FORSYTHE, et al.,
8
Plaintiff,
3:10-CV-00716-RCJ(VPC)
ORDER
9
v.
10
JOSEPH BROWN, et al.,
11
Defendants.
___________________________________
12
13
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (#141) entered on February 6, 2012.
14
Plaintiff filed Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#148) and Defendants
15
filed an Opposition to Objections (#152).
16
The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
17
the Plaintiffs, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
18
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The district court may accept, reject, or modify in
19
whole or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
20
The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#141) entered on
21
February 6, 2012 is adopted and accepted.
22
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#141)
is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: this 18th day of May, 2012.
26
27
28
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?