Van Nort v. Apple et al

Filing 9

JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in its Order of February 9, 2011, the court dismissed the complaint, finding the claims duplicative of claims plaintiff has brought in other actions before this court (docket 3 ). Plaintiff has failed to make an adequate showing under either Rule 60(b) or 59(e) that this court's order dismissing the action should be reversed. THEREFORE, plaintiff's 7 motion to alter or amend judgment is DENIED and judgment is hereby entered dismissing and closing this case. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 4/29/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
*****

DISTRICT OF

NEVADA

SCOTTIE RAY VAN NORT,
Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

V.
CASE NUMBER: 3:10-CV-00720-RCJ-RAM
JOHN APPLE, et al.,
Defendants.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried
and the jury has rendered its verdict.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been
tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
X

Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been
considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in its Order of February 9, 2011, the court dismissed
the complaint, finding the claims duplicative of claims plaintiff has brought in other actions before this
court (docket #3). Plaintiff has failed to make an adequate showing under either Rule 60(b) or 59(e) that
this court's order dismissing the action should be reversed. THEREFORE, plaintiff's motion to alter or
amend judgment (docket #7) is DENIED and judgment is hereby entered dismissing and closing this
case.

April 29, 2011

LANCE S. WILSON
Clerk

/s/ Katie Lynn Ogden
Deputy Clerk