Light Guard Systems, Inc vs Spot Devices, Inc.

Filing 153

JUDGMENT. The Court HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1. Light Guards claim that all versions of the RS200 and RS320 infringe the 742 patent is dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Court enters judgment in favor of Spot Devices, Inc. for its declaratory judgment counterclaim of non-infringement, and declares that none of the versions of the RS200 and RS320 IRWLs at issue in this case infringe claims 1 - 15 of the 742 patent. 3. This is a final, appealable, judgment disposing of all claims asserted in this action. 4. The parties are each responsible for their own costs. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/12/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12

LIGHT GUARD SYSTEMS, INC., a California
Corporation,

13

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15
16

SPOT DEVICES, INC., a Nevada Corporation,
and HAWS CORPORATION, a Nevada
Corporation,
Defendants

17
18

SPOT DEVICES, INC.,

19
Counterclaim Plaintiff,

20
v.
21

LIGHT GUARD SYSTEMS, INC.,
22

Counterclaim Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Case No.: 3:10-cv-00737-LRH-(WGC)
FINAL JUDGMENT

1

This Court has dismissed all claims in this case with the exception of plaintiff and

2

counterclaim defendant Light Guard System Inc.’s (Light Guard) claim that all versions of the

3

RS200 and RS320 in roadway warning lights (IRWLs) at issue in this case infringe claims 1 - 15

4

of US Patent No. 6,384,742 (“the 742 patent”).

5

On June 12, 2012, this Court entered its order regarding claim construction. Light Guard

6

acknowledges that under the Court’s claim construction ruling, the versions of the RS200 and

7

RS320 IRWLs at issue in this case do not infringe claims 1 - 15 of the 742 patent.

8
9

Accordingly, good cause appearing therefor, the Court HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES,
AND DECREES that:

10
11
12
13

1.

Light Guard’s claim that all versions of the RS200 and RS320 infringe the 742

patent is dismissed with prejudice.
2.

The Court enters judgment in favor of Spot Devices, Inc. for its declaratory

14

judgment counterclaim of non-infringement, and declares that none of the versions of the RS200

15

and RS320 IRWLs at issue in this case infringe claims 1 - 15 of the 742 patent.

16

3.

This is a final, appealable, judgment disposing of all claims asserted in this action.

17

4.

The parties are each responsible for their own costs.

18

DATED: July ___, 2012
12,

19
20
The Honorable Larry R. Hicks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22

LEGAL02/33488428v2

23
24
25
26
27
28

2