Rosales-Martinez v. Palmer

Filing 141

ORDER granting ECF No. 140 Stipulation Extending Time for Plaintiff to File Response to ECF Nos. 136 Motion to Dismiss, 137 Motion for More Definite Statement and 138 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 2/4/2018. Replies due by 2/22/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

1
2
3
4
5
6

L. Edward Humphrey—NV Bar 9066
HUMPHREY LAW PLLC
201 West Liberty Street, Suite 204
Reno, Nevada 89501
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Pedro Rosales-Martinez

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

PEDRO ROSALES-MARTINEZ
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

Case No.: 3:10-cv-00748-MMD-VPC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED
RULE 12 MOTIONS (ECF Nos. 136,
137, and 138)

v.
COLBY PALMER, et. al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16
17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Pedro Rosales-Martinez
(“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Washoe County, Heidi Poe, City of Reno, Colby Palmer and
Rick Ayala (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys, that

19
20

Plaintiff may have additional time within which to respond to Washoe County’s Renewed

21

Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 136], Defendant Heidi Poe’s (Second) Renewed Motion for

22

More Definite Statement [ECF 137], and Defendants City of Reno, Colby Palmer and Rick

23
24

Ayala’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss [ECF 138] each filed on December 21, 2017
(collectively, the “Defendants’ Renewed Rule 12 Motions”). Pursuant to this Stipulation,

25
26

Plaintiff shall have until February 4, 2018 in which to file a Response/Opposition to the

27

Defendants’ Rule 12 Motions, and Defendants shall each have until February 22, 2018 to file

28

any reply thereto.

1

1
2

Good cause exists for this extension as Plaintiff’s counsel has just recently been
engaged to represent the Plaintiff regarding the remaining elements of the case and requires

3
4
5
6
7

time to become knowledgeable about the case and its procedural posture, and to prepare a
response.
This stipulation is not filed for any dilatory or improper purpose.
HUMPHREY LAW PLLC

CHRISTOPHER J. HICKS
DISTRICT ATTORNEY

By: /s/ L. Edward Humphrey
L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. NSBN 9066
201 W. LIBERTY STREET, SUITE 204
RENO, NEVADA 89501
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Herbert B. Kaplan
Herbert B. Kaplan, Esq.
Deputy District Attorney, NSBN 7395
P.O. BOX 11130
RENO, NV 89520-0027
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for Washoe County

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

KARL S. HALL
RENO CITY ATTORNEY

ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General

17
18
19
20
21
22

By: /s/ Mark W. Dunagan
Mark W. Dunagan, Esq.
Deputy City Attorney, NSBN 10574
Post Office Box 1900
Reno, Nevada 89505
Tel: [phone]
Attorneys for City of Reno

By: /s/ Nathan L Hastings
Nathan L. Hastings, NSBN 11593
Senior Deputy Attorney General
555 Wright Way
Carson City, Nevada 89711
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Heidi Poe

23
24
25

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:

26
27
28

_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
January 4
Dated __________________, 2018.

2