Flores-Gonzales v. United States of America

Filing 7

ORDERED that the clerk file P's request for final disposition on USM's hold, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. FURTHER ORD that P's request for final disposition on USM's hold, pursuant to the Interstate Agre ement on Detainers Act is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice to P filing his request in the correct court. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORD that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/15/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

-VPC Flores-Gonzales v. United States of America

Doc. 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The court assessed the filing fee based upon this suit being commenced as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon review of petitioner's request, it appears that it is not a habeas corpus petition, which makes the filing fee different. However, because the court is dismissing this action, the matter is largely moot.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
ERIK FLORES-GONZALES, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent. Case No. 3:10-CV-00751-ECR-(VPC) ORDER

Petitioner has paid the filing fee (#6). The court has reviewed his request for final disposition on United States Marshals' hold, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act.1 The court will dismiss this action. Petitioner alleges that the United States Marshals Service has placed with the Nevada Department of Corrections a detainer against him for an unspecified, untried federal offense. He claims that he has delivered a request pursuant to Article III(a) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers for final disposition of those charges. See 18 U.S.C. App. 2, § 2. He further claims that no action has been taken upon his request. Petitioner is in the wrong court. The court has reviewed its records, and no criminal charges against petitioner are pending in this court. This court has no power to order another

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

United States District Court to act upon his request for final disposition pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. Petitioner needs to make his request in the United States District Court for the district where he has been indicted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk file petitioner's request for final disposition on United States Marshals' hold, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's request for final disposition on United States Marshals' hold, pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice to petitioner filing his request in the correct court. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, to the extent that one is necessary. DATED this 15th day of March 2011.

_________________________________ EDWARD C. REED United States District Judge

-2-