Aytch v. LeGrand et al

Filing 11

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED the Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner, with Megan C. Hoffman, Esq. appearing as petitioner's counsel. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have one-hundred twenty (120) days to fi le an amended petition. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the CJA Coordinator for this Division (Ack'd). (See Order for specifics)(Amended Petition due by 7/29/2011.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/30/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 3/31/2011 to correct grammatical error. (MLC).

Download PDF
-RAM Aytch v. LeGrand et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ROBERT LEGRAND, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ___________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARTINEZ S. AYTCH, Petitioner, vs. ORDER 3:10-cv-00767-RCJ-RAM Following upon the notice (#9) of appearance by petitioner's counsel in this habeas matter, IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B), with Megan C. Hoffman, Esq., appearing as petitioner's counsel of record. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have until up to and including one hundred twenty (120) days from entry of this order within which to file an amended petition. The Court will screen any amended petition filed prior to ordering a response from respondents. Nothing in this order in and of itself tolls the running of the federal limitation period as to claims that do not relate back to the original petition. See #3, at 1, lines 26-27 (noting the possibility that time may remain in the federal one-year limitation period). The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator for this Division. DATED: This 30th day of March, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?