Chandler v. NDEX WEST, LLC et al
Filing
115
ORDER granting 108 Motion to Substitute Attorney (Attorneys Robert R. Hager and Treva J. Hearne terminated), and denying 110 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9
JACQUIE CHANDLER
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.; et al.,
13
Defendants.
3:10-cv-0769-LRH-RAM
ORDER
14
15
Before the court are plaintiff Jacquie Chandler’s (“Chandler”) motion to substitute counsel
16
(Doc. #1081 ) and motion to stay (Doc. #110).
17
I.
Motion to Substitute Counsel
18
In her motion to substitute counsel, Chandler seeks to represent herself in pro per and allow
19
her current counsel Robert R. Hager and Treva J. Hearne to withdraw from this action. Good cause
20
and appropriate substitution of counsel appearing, the court shall grant Chandler’s motion.
21
II.
Motion to Stay
22
In her motion to stay, Chandler seeks to stay an order from the Nevada Justice Court,
23
entered in a separately initiated state court action. See Doc. #110. The court has reviewed the
24
motion to stay and finds that it is without merit. The Justice Court order was entered in a separate
25
26
1
Refers to the court’s docket number.
1
state court action over which this court has no jurisdiction and which has no relation to the issues
2
raised by Chandler in this federal action. Accordingly, the court shall deny the motion to stay.
3
4
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to substitute counsel (Doc. #108) is
5
GRANTED. Robert R. Hager and Treva J. Hearne shall be removed as counsel of record for
6
plaintiff Jacquie Chandler.
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to stay (Doc. #110) is DENIED.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED this 10th day of December, 2012.
10
11
12
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?