Jackson v. Doe et al

Filing 101

ORDER adopting and accepting 92 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 65 and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 81 are DENIED. The parties shall file a joint pre-trial order with the court within 45 days of this order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/28/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

*****

9
10
11
12
13

ALFONSO JACKSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JOHN DOE; et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )

3:10-cv-00771-LRH-WGC
O RDER

14
15

Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb

16

(#921 ) entered on July 5, 2012, recommending denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

17

(#65) filed on January 31, 2012, and denying Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#81)

18

filed on April 23, 2012.

19

Recommendation (#93) on July 18, 2012. Plaintiff filed his Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Report

20

and Recommendation (#98) on August 20, 2012. No responses have been filed. This action was

21

referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and LR IB 1-4 of the Local Rules

22

of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Defendants filed their Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

23

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of

24

the Plaintiff and Defendants, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters

25
26

1

Refers to court’s docket number.

1

of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) and Local Rule IB 3- 2. The Court determines that the

2

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#92) entered on July 5, 2012, should be adopted and

3

accepted.

4

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#92)

5

entered on July 5, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

6

(#65) is DENIED.

7
8
9
10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#81) is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint pre-trial order with the court
within 45 days of this order.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

DATED this 28th day of September, 2012.

13
14
15

_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2