Jackson v. Doe et al

Filing 53

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 12/9/2011 before Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Crtrm Administrator: Jennifer Cotter; Pla Counsel: Alfonso Jackson, In Pro Per (telephonically); Def Counsel: Daniel Slimak; FTR #: 10:04:07 a.m. - 10:48:25 a.m.; Courtroom: 2. IT IS ORDERED that 34 Motion for Leave to File is DENIED; 35 Motion to Extend Time is found as MOOT; and 43 Motion is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff may attempt to serve by publication those defendants who have not yet appeared in this case. Dispositive Motions due by 1/31/2012.Please see attached minutes for further details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENO, NEVADA
ALFONSO JACKSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff(s),
vs.
JOHN DOE, et al.,
Defendant(s).

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0771-LRH-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
DATED: DECEMBER 9, 2011

PRESENT: HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB , U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Deputy Clerk: JENNIFER COTTER

Reporter: FTR: 10:04:07 a.m. - 10:48:25 a.m.

Counsel for Plaintiff(s): ALFONSO JACKSON, In Pro Per (telephonically)
Counsel for Defendant(s): DANIEL SLIMAK
PROCEEDINGS: MOTION HEARING
10:04 a.m. Court convenes.
Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Docket #34) and Motion for Leave to File
Amended Complaint and Request for Enlargement of Time (Docket #35)
The Court ascertains that plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to add a claim of deliberate
indifference to serious medical needs and hears argument from the parties. The Court sets forth its
findings on the record. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is
DENIED and that the Motion for Enlargement of Time is found as MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any dispositive motion shall be filed no later than January 31,
2012. The Court requests that Mr. Slimak submit a copy of the extraction video, referred to at this
hearing, along with any exhibits. Mr. Slimak agrees to do so.
Motion Identifying Unserved Defendants and Request for Order to Identify Them Through
Publication (Docket #43)
IT IS ORDERED that the subject motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff may attempt to
serve by publication those defendants who have not appeared in the case. Plaintiff is advised that
the Court cannot assist him with this, and that he is responsible for any expenses that may arise in
this process.

Page Two
Minutes
Jackson v. Doe, et al. (3:10-cv-0771-LRH-WGC)
December 9, 2011
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Slimak shall verify the last known addresses of Glinda Stroik,
James Minnix, and Joshua Conner. He shall then file a notice, no later than noon on Friday,
December 16, 2011 advising the Court of his findings.
10:48 a.m. Court adjourns.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: /s/
Deputy Clerk