Jackson v. Doe et al

Filing 79

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 4/4/2012 before Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Crtrm Administrator: Jennifer Cotter; Pla Counsel: Alfonso Jackson, In Pro Per (telephonically); Def Counsel: Daniel Slimak (telephon ically); FTR #: 9:00:08 a.m. - 9:14:01 a.m.; Courtroom: 2. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Exceeed Copywork is GRANTED to the extent as shown in the attached minutes. Motion to Stay 60 , Motion to Reopen Discovery 61 , Motions for Enlargement of Time 71 and 77 , are DENIED. Please see attached minutes for details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RENO, NEVADA
ALFONSO JACKSON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff(s),
vs.
JOHN DOE, et al.,
Defendant(s).

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0771-LRH-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
DATED: APRIL 4, 2012

PRESENT: HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB , U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Deputy Clerk: JENNIFER COTTER

Reporter: FTR: 9:00:08 a.m. - 9:14:01 a.m.

Counsel for Plaintiff(s): ALFONSO JACKSON, In Pro Per (telephonically)
Counsel for Defendant(s): DANIEL SLIMAK (telephonically)
PROCEEDINGS: MOTION HEARING
9:00 a.m. Court convenes.
Motion to Exceed $100 Copywork Limit (Docket #75)
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Exceed Copywork Limit is GRANTED to the extent that
Plaintiff shall be allowed an additional $25.00 in copies for the purpose of litigating the remainder
of this case.
Motion to Stay Summary Judgment and Motion to Reopen Discovery (Dockets #60/61),
Motion Requesting an Enlargement of Time and Motion to Reopen Discovery (Docket #71),
and Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
(Docket #77)
The Court recites the history of the case with respect to the service of various defendants and
specifically addresses the lack of service regarding Defendant Minnix. Plaintiff asserts that he sent
the required service documents to the Clerk’s Office rather than the United States Marshal’s Office.
However, the records indicate that these documents were never received by either office.
IT IS ORDERED that the subject motions are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (Docket #65) no later than April 27, 2012. Defendants shall file their reply by
May 11, 2012.

Page Two
Jackson v. Doe, et al. (3:10-cv-0771-LRH-WGC)
April 4, 2012
While the Court is not going to delay these proceedings any further, Plaintiff shall be allowed to
attempt to serve Defendant Minnix one last time.
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall send to Plaintiff a copy of the order entered on
December 21, 2011 (Docket #57), a USM-285 form, and a copy of Second Amended Complaint
(Docket #12). Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days from the receipt of these documents to return them
to the U.S. Marshal’s Office at 400 S. Virginia St., Suite #201, Reno, NV, 89501.
Plaintiff is advised that there is no guarantee that service will be accomplished in time, and the
deadlines currently in place will not be moved.
9:14:01 a.m. Court adjourns.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: /s/
Deputy Clerk