Sampson v. Palmer et al
Filing
112
ORDER granting ECF No. 110 Petitioner's Motion for an Extension of Time to Continue the State Retrial; The Court's order conditionally granting a writ of habeas corpus ECF No. 105 Order is MODIFIED such that Petitioner shall be released from custody pursuant to the conditional writ granted unless the State initiates retrial by 8/8/2017; that nothing herein constitutes or is intended to constitute a purported direction by this Court to the Eighth Judicial D istrict Court for the State of Nevada to continue any calendar call, trial, or other proceeding in that court; that nothing herein suggests by implication that the federal Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., is applicable to the state c ourt retrial; Clerk SHALL SEND a copy of this Order to Honorable Michelle Leavitt, District Judge; Clerk of the Eighth judicial District Court for the State of NV; and the Clark County District Attorney, in connection with Case No. C-182431 (mailed 03/27/2017). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 03/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
WILLIE SAMPSON,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
Case No. 3:11-cv-00019-LRH-WGC
JACK PALMER, et al.,
13
ORDER
Respondents.
14
15
16
17
This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a
Nevada state prisoner.
On June 13, 2016, the petition was conditionally granted. (ECF No. 105). Respondents
18
filed a notice of election to retry petitioner in the Eighth Judicial District Court for the State of
19
Nevada. (ECF No. 107). On November 3, 2016, this Court granted petitioner’s motion for an
20
extension of time for the State to initiate retrial until May 10, 2017. (ECF No. 109). On March 9,
21
2017, petitioner filed another motion to continue the retrial. (ECF No. 110). On March 21, 2017,
22
respondents filed a notice of non-opposition to petitioner’s motion. (ECF No. 111). Good cause
23
appearing petitioner’s motion is granted as set forth below.
24
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to for an extension of time to
25
continue the State retrial (ECF No. 110) is GRANTED, consistent with the remaining provisions of
26
this order.
27
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s order conditionally granting a writ of habeas
corpus (ECF No. 105) is MODIFIED such that petitioner shall be released from custody pursuant
1
to the conditional writ grant unless the State initiates retrial in the state district court by August 8,
2
2017, subject to reasonable modification of the foregoing deadline by the parties.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that nothing herein constitutes or is intended to constitute a
4
purported direction by this Court to the Eighth Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada to
5
continue any calendar call, trial, or other proceeding in that court. This order merely modifies this
6
Court’s own order to extend the time allowed under the conditional grant of a writ of habeas corpus
7
within which to commence a retrial of petitioner. The matter of whether a particular calendar call,
8
trial, or other proceeding in the state district court should be continued is a matter that is exclusively
9
within the province of that court. Accordingly, following upon this Court’s extension of the period
10
for retrial under its own prior order, petitioner must present any requests for relief as to specific state
11
court settings to the state district court.
12
13
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that nothing herein suggests by implication that the federal
Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., is applicable to the state court retrial.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL SEND a copy of this order
15
to the following: Honorable Michelle Leavitt, District Judge; the Clerk of the Eighth Judicial
16
District Court for the State of Nevada; and the Clark County District Attorney, in connection with
17
Case No. C-182432.
18
DATED this 24th day of March, 2017.
19
20
21
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?