Sampson v. Palmer et al

Filing 35

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for petitioner shall meet w/ petitioner as soon as reasonably possible. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner shall have 90 days, to file and serve a first amended petition for WHC. Respondents shall have 4 5 days after service of a first amended petition w/in which to answer, or otherwise respond. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have 45 days to answer to the original petition. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner shall have 45 days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. FURTHER ORDERED, counsel for respondents shall make available to counsel for petitioner copies of state court record regarding the judgment petitioner is challenging. FURTHER ORDERED, any state court record exhibits filed by petitioner or respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be forwarded -for this case- to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/13/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 WILLIE SAMPSON, 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 JACK PALMER, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 3:11-cv-00019-LRH-WGC ORDER 15 This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which petitioner, a 16 state prisoner, is proceeding with representation of counsel. On February 8, 2012, the court granted 17 petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel and ordered counsel to file a notice of appearance. 18 (ECF No. 33.) On March 9, 2012, counsel for petitioner filed a notice of appearance. (ECF No. 34.) 19 Petitioner’s counsel is Paul G. Turner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, 411 E. Bonneville Avenue, 20 Suite 250, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89101. 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that counsel for petitioner shall meet with petitioner as soon 22 as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so, to: (a) review the procedures applicable in 23 cases under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; (b) discuss and explore with petitioner, as fully as possible, the potential 24 grounds for habeas corpus relief in petitioner’s case; and (c) advise petitioner that all possible grounds 25 for habeas corpus relief must be raised at this time in this action and that the failure to do so will likely 26 result in any omitted grounds being barred from future review. 27 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have ninety (90) days, to file and serve a 28 first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, which shall include all known grounds for relief (both 1 exhausted and unexhausted). Respondents shall have forty five (45) days after service of a first 2 amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended petition. If petitioner 3 does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have forty five (45) days from the date on which 4 the amended petition is due within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, petitioner’s original 5 petition. Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, 6 including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be 7 entertained. If an answer is filed, respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the 8 Rules Governing Proceedings in the United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. 9 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have forty five (45) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for respondents shall make available to counsel for 12 petitioner (photocopying costs at the latter’s expense), as soon as reasonably possible, copies of whatever 13 portions of the state court record they possess regarding the judgment petitioner is challenging in this 14 case. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by petitioner or 16 respondents shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. 17 The CM/ECF attachments that are filed further shall be identified by the number or numbers (or letter 18 or letters) of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record 19 exhibits shall be forwarded – for this case – to the staff attorneys in Reno. 20 21 DATED this 13th day of March, 2012. 22 23 24 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?