Underwood v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.

Filing 31

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's 20 motion to file a second amended complaint is granted in part and denied in part in accordance with this order. The bond previously posted by plaintiff shall remain deposited with the cl erk of court. FURTHERMORE, upon the filing of the plaintiff's second amended complaint, the defendant's 9 motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for a more definite statement, shall be denied as moot. The denial is without prejudice should the defendant elect to file a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RICHARD UNDERWOOD, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., 17 Defendant. 3:11-cv-00035-HDM-RAM ORDER 18 The court has been advised that plaintiff has complied with the 19 required claims process pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 370.3(a), 49 C.F.R. 20 § 1005.2(a), and the defendant’s tariff. Accordingly, leave is 21 granted to the plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Any such 22 complaint shall be limited to a claim under the Carmack Amendment. 23 The inclusion of a claim for intentional infliction of emotional 24 distress would be futile as it is preempted by the Carmack Amendment 25 “to the extent it arises from the same conduct as the claims for 26 delay, loss or damage to shipped property.” White v. Mayflower 27 Transit, 28 L.L.C., 543 F.3d 581, 586 (9th Cir. 2008). Despite 1 plaintiff’s assertion otherwise, his proposed claim for intentional 2 infliction 3 underlying his Carmack Amendment claim. Plaintiff is therefore denied 4 leave to amend his complaint to add a claim for emotional distress. 5 Accordingly, 6 complaint (#20) is granted in part and denied in part in accordance 7 with this order. The bond previously posted by plaintiff shall remain 8 deposited with the clerk of the court. of emotional the distress plaintiff’s arises motion to from file the a same second conduct amended 9 Upon the filing of the plaintiff’s second amended complaint, the 10 defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative motion for a 11 more definite statement(#9), shall be denied as moot. The denial is 12 without prejudice should the defendant elect to file a motion to 13 dismiss the second amended complaint. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 DATED this 14th day of April, 2011. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?