Underwood v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Filing
31
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's 20 motion to file a second amended complaint is granted in part and denied in part in accordance with this order. The bond previously posted by plaintiff shall remain deposited with the cl erk of court. FURTHERMORE, upon the filing of the plaintiff's second amended complaint, the defendant's 9 motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for a more definite statement, shall be denied as moot. The denial is without prejudice should the defendant elect to file a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
RICHARD UNDERWOOD,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
ALLIED VAN LINES, INC.,
17
Defendant.
3:11-cv-00035-HDM-RAM
ORDER
18
The court has been advised that plaintiff has complied with the
19
required claims process pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 370.3(a), 49 C.F.R.
20
§ 1005.2(a), and the defendant’s
tariff. Accordingly, leave is
21
granted to the plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Any such
22
complaint shall be limited to a claim under the Carmack Amendment.
23
The inclusion of a claim for intentional infliction of emotional
24
distress would be futile as it is preempted by the Carmack Amendment
25
“to the extent it arises from the same conduct as the claims for
26
delay, loss or damage to shipped property.” White v. Mayflower
27
Transit,
28
L.L.C.,
543
F.3d
581,
586
(9th
Cir.
2008).
Despite
1
plaintiff’s assertion otherwise, his proposed claim for intentional
2
infliction
3
underlying his Carmack Amendment claim. Plaintiff is therefore denied
4
leave to amend his complaint to add a claim for emotional distress.
5
Accordingly,
6
complaint (#20) is granted in part and denied in part in accordance
7
with this order. The bond previously posted by plaintiff shall remain
8
deposited with the clerk of the court.
of
emotional
the
distress
plaintiff’s
arises
motion
to
from
file
the
a
same
second
conduct
amended
9
Upon the filing of the plaintiff’s second amended complaint, the
10
defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative motion for a
11
more definite statement(#9), shall be denied as moot. The denial is
12
without prejudice should the defendant elect to file a motion to
13
dismiss the second amended complaint.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
DATED this 14th day of April, 2011.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?