Elliott v. McDaniel et al

Filing 81

ORDERED Respondents' first and second motions for extension of time to file an answer (ECF Nos. 76 , 77 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No. 79 ) is granted. Petitioner must file his reply on or before May 1, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

ROBERT W. ELLIOTT,

7

Case No. 3:11-cv-00041-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
8
E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11

Robert W. Elliott’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

12

is before the Court on motions to extend time by both parties. The Court finds that good

13

cause exists to grant the motions.

14
15

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ first and second motions for extension of
time to file an answer (ECF Nos. 76, 77) are both granted nunc pro tunc.

16

It is further ordered that Petitioner’s motion for extension of time to file a reply in

17

support of the petition (ECF No. 79) is granted. Petitioner must file his reply on or before

18

May 1, 2020.

19

DATED THIS 6th day of April 2020.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE