Hill v. Palmer et al

Filing 149

ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF Nos. 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 144 , 145 , 146 , and 148 motions; directing Petitioner to file no further documents in this closed case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/3/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

CHARLES H. HILL,

10

Case No. 3:11-cv-00048-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
JACK PALMER, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
15

This Court dismissed petitioner Charles H. Hill’s counseled habeas petition as

16

untimely on December 22, 2014 (ECF No. 118), and judgment was entered (ECF No.

17

126). The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Hill’s appeal on April 3, 2015 (ECF

18

No. 131).

19

Despite the fact that the Court has previously admonished Hill at least twice to file

20

no further documents in this closed case, he has filed several documents, including an

21

application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, this case is closed. If petitioner wishes

22

to seek leave to file another federal habeas corpus petition challenging the same

23

judgment of conviction, he must file a motion with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 28

24

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).

25

It is therefore ordered that the following motions filed by petitioner: application to

26

proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 139); motion to extend prison copywork limit (ECF

27

No. 140); five motions for leave to file motion (ECF Nos. 141, 142, 145, 146, and 148);

28

and motion to grant unopposed motions ECF No. 144) are all denied.

1
2
3

It is further ordered that petitioner is directed to file no further documents in this
closed case.
DATED THIS 3rd day of February

4
5
6

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2